win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT  (Read 6289 times)

bowlingnut76

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 376
  • Love to hit the lanes....
hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« on: July 15, 2012, 06:03:38 AM »
what happened out there none of there equipment looked all that impressive in the shoot out....last place of all the brands.....hell not that impressed with none OF THE EBONITE brands....TOMMY JONES WHERES HIS HEAD OUT....Jason couch was pissed at him u could tell....hell i retire with teammates like that....couch should leave ebonite go else where....probably have more success....Columbia...was OK... what ball was Barnes using....track started looking good 4th place right now...those guys are going to hard to beat....dv8 looked good early but quickly falling...chugs needs try different ball....900 global very impressed....Missy p needs something little stronger on backends....Brunswick ciminelli and rash lights out.....c system ball was money...saw Sean using new nexxus did OK...storm looks good but alot of people don't use two hands...but pdw looking solid as of late...shaky bowling earlier......i must say really enjoyed this format alot hope the pba sticks with it....the announcing was blah...rob stone did the best because he had alot of energy....made the broadcast enjoyable some what....Lon m should stick to poker....
Shut the front door...Buddies pro shop still best deals on net

 

Coach Bonesaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Go Sarge Easter
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2012, 10:45:32 AM »
Barnes was tossing a Wicked Encounter most of the time.
In the bag:

Roto Grip Magic Gem
Motiv Primal Shock
Hammer Ocean Vibe

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6754
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #2 on: July 15, 2012, 08:57:19 PM »
Jones has been fighting several injuries lately and looked like he was having footing issues.  Hard to throw it your best when you're just trying not to fall down.

Machugu threw it really good all day, but maybe needed to find something a little cleaner through the front part of the lane later in the day.  Russell was the one who never looked comfortable.  Yanked quite a few left and looked off balance on a lot of shots.

Hammer was the big disappointment.  Neither bowler ever looked comfortable on the pattern.  Track and Roto struggled early but improved.  Hammer just never got it going.

Long Gone Daddy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5471
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #3 on: July 15, 2012, 09:41:47 PM »
"......i must say really enjoyed this format alot hope the pba sticks with it."

Wow.  Really?  REALLY?
Long Gone also posts the honest truth which is why i respect him. He posts these things knowing some may not like it.

Mainzer

Pat Patterson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1852
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2012, 09:50:02 AM »
"......i must say really enjoyed this format alot hope the pba sticks with it."

Wow.  Really?  REALLY?

The event was actually pretty good television, the only thing I was tired of was every time Sean Rash got on the approach, they repeatedly referred to him as the reigning POY, if you didn't know he was before this event you surely knew by the time this event was over with.  :)
Pat Patterson

Coach Bonesaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Go Sarge Easter
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2012, 10:05:05 AM »
I enjoyed it. Hammer disappointed me, but I was happy to see Robert Smith bowling again.
In the bag:

Roto Grip Magic Gem
Motiv Primal Shock
Hammer Ocean Vibe

Spider Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11829
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2012, 02:09:20 PM »
the doubles stepladder portion wasn't bad. but after the train wreck that was the single ball, only the diehards were watching. if the PBA wants to hook new viewers, they can't open with a confusing mess. 

I was left wondering if the PBA intended the single ball rounds to look like a birthday party on the lanes. you had ice cream, nachos and booze in camera shot through out...

lefty50

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1822
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2012, 03:40:02 PM »
One thing that I have not yet seen mentioned and wonder if anyone else had the same problem I did: this was supposed to be a shootout between ball manufacturers with their own reps, but I for one never saw any segment or even minimal information on who was throwing what ball and how/why they laid it out. I saw more wall information and layout information on regular shows than this supposed battle of the companies... Of course, that type of information may have been more embarrassing than helpful for some, particularly Hammer. I really would lhave liked it though. I know that the casual Sunday afternoon bowling observer may not have cared, but I guarantee they wouldn't care for the rest of that train wreck either.

Just my $.02....

tenpin1010

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2012, 04:58:35 PM »
I liked the broadcast overall but I thought that this year's one ball Eliminator format was lame.  It reminded me of this year's Chris Paul celebrity tournament.  Last year's Baker format was much better IMHO. 
Still, it is a good chance to see this Summer's new ball releases in the hands of PBA pros.  Unless you're a Roto Grip fan of course.  Then you got to see last year's Bandit and a two year old Rising Star being thrown lol.

greenefam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 852
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2012, 06:09:30 PM »
The value of the single ball eliminator, like it or not, is the ability to get more bowlers involved.

I was a bit surprised with some of the bowler choices, but I guess that is more of a scheduling issue more than anything else.  I was surprised that Ebonite didn't bring out the best female bowler in the world these days, Kelly Kulick.  They had an additional roster spot they could have used and given Tommy Jones' injury problems that may have both helped them as well as showcased an important Ebonite asset.  Also was surprised Storm chose to go with both Belmo and Osku while they have Norm Duke at there disposal.

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24523
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2012, 08:31:03 PM »
The value of the single ball eliminator, like it or not, is the ability to get more bowlers involved.

I was a bit surprised with some of the bowler choices, but I guess that is more of a scheduling issue more than anything else.  I was surprised that Ebonite didn't bring out the best female bowler in the world these days, Kelly Kulick.  They had an additional roster spot they could have used and given Tommy Jones' injury problems that may have both helped them as well as showcased an important Ebonite asset.  Also was surprised Storm chose to go with both Belmo and Osku while they have Norm Duke at there disposal.

I was also surprised that Brunswick did not have Parker Bohn there.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

jrs813

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #11 on: July 17, 2012, 09:02:32 AM »
i was told by a storm staffer they took the top three in season points.  kretzer did throw the edge the little he bowled.  it was advertised all over the back of the shirts though.  belmo did make the fire road look great, but what ball doesn't look great with his rev rate.  lol.

MrPerfect

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 703
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #12 on: July 18, 2012, 08:03:07 PM »
I really liked whatever Fagan and Mika were throwing.

Jones looked like he should of stayed home, he absolutely no tempo and was totally stiff the entire competition.

Suprised to see D-Mac have so many issues.

Barnes was Barnes not suprising.

I didn't see all the shows, but I personally thought the best bowler of the series was Belmonte. Just had the right ball and the right line to get away with murder when he made mistakes which were few and far between.

stc067

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 734
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #13 on: July 19, 2012, 01:02:49 AM »
They said Tommy Jones had a neck injury,it definitely showed, he didn't look like himself at all.They would have been better off having Kelly Kulick bowl in his place. My favorite part of the series was watching Barnes play the Walter Ray line.(Missiles up the five board!)

ronsyl

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
Re: hammer? SPOILER FOR SHOOT OUT
« Reply #14 on: July 19, 2012, 11:16:28 AM »
singles were sad
doubles were good