Covert Tank Vs Fever Pitch
Since everything is based on bowler my specs are
380 rev rate
speed, about 13 MPH as per monitor
3 degrees axis tilt,
axis rotation about 50 degree but can vary a bit
rev dominant no thumb bowler
My fever pitch is drilled with 5 inch pin PAP
Covert Tank is 4 inch
Fever pitch is a little longer and snaps more on backend. I need to move a few boards more inside to use covert tank. So covert tank is noticeably stronger. I think both ball compliment each other - considering my specs it's like the companies made them just for me.
Although I did have the covert tank drilled with stronger layout, as I thought that would give different motion than fever pitch, and it did.
If you look at Tamer Bowling's reviews, at end of covert tank review mentions that for the low rev player it was hooking more than fever pitch. I think he's review of the balls matches the difference I see.
I have a Visionary Crow, which I hardly use b/c I dropped from 15 to 14 pounds when went to no-thumb. I think the Covert Tank is similar in motion to that - but a little more continuous on back end (and no carrydown issue).
Carrydown has not been an issue with either ball. For whatever reason, with my specs I have seen very noticeable carrydown with weak pearl reactive's, and strong reactives are too much for me on anything but heaviest oil. For any rev-dominant no-thumb or 2 handed bowler, you can't go wrong with either one.
Both balls are much stronger than a traditional urethane. I have to move about a whole arrow outside to use blue hammer compared to fever pitch.
