win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity  (Read 1621 times)

elvismat

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 117
Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
« on: January 14, 2009, 03:54:49 AM »
I have a Break and was looking for something stronger for oil.  From what I've observed, the two best hooking balls for heavy oiled lanes with carry down, is the Bounty and the Virtual Gravity.  Does anybody know, which one is better?  My pap is 5 5/8's, with 5/8's up, I'm more of a tweener, with about 16 mph, avg'ing around 220 in every league.

All replies are welcomed.

Thanks..
Logged

 

missed messenger

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
« Reply #1 on: January 15, 2009, 10:12:02 AM »
Not even close, the VG is way better and more on the backend then the Bounty
Logged

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
« Reply #2 on: January 15, 2009, 10:15:46 AM »
How do you know a Bounty and VG are the best in oil? I would say the best in oil with out question is the Ntense LevRG. I would go with Bounty btw if I had to choose between the two but open to any oiler go with Ntense any day.
--------------------
''If their is a life after death,
  then their is no death,
  and if their is no death,
  we do not live''
                   

Progressive Metal Band
EVERGREY


MainzerPower
Logged
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

tenpin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1681
Re: Bounty vs Virtual Gravity
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2009, 05:59:31 AM »
Well if you not sure about the Bounty there is always the new AMF release.  I am sure this one is going to handle oil better than the VG and the NTense.
http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=225206&ForumID=1&CategoryID=2
http://www.amf300.com/index.cfm?p=balls&bid=43
--------------------
Derek Trowbridge
900 Global:No oil pattern we can't tame
www.900global.com
www.AMF300.com

Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »