Geez, guys, as somebody that works for a major bowling magazine, all I can say is:
1) If anything, people posting info would do MORE for the mag, not LESS.
2) What Lillen did would most likely be acceptable under the doctrines of fair use, and, furthermore, he (for all practical purposes) attributed the information to BTM. He didn't copy a whole article and he didn't not say who wrote the info. Once BTM publishes the info, it has to be expected that people will share said info.
3) Like kidjete said, I'm pretty darn sure BTM doesn't give $#i+. [ON EDIT] Charlest claims they do, and again, if they do, ok, but I still think you could counter their claims with a fair use defense, though you are not adding anything new to the work.
4) Even raising the issue of supposed copyright violations would use up way too many resources to make such a practice viable.
--------------------
www.900global.comwww.bowlersjournal.comEdited on 3/19/2008 1:34 AM