Interesting. What numbers? The R.G., diff, and mid diff, or actual coverstock ratings?
Tekneek has the Integral Break Pearl listed on ebay, and it's listed as having the S70 cover.
Even so, as far as I know, the rating system is only a guideline to rate the aggressiveness, so S70 (on the Integral Break, or even the Profit) doesn't even mean it is the same cover as the original Break, or Break Pearl.
S75 doesn't tell us anything other than it should be more aggressive than the S70 or even the S73 of the Bank. And even then, it really doesn't mean much because as 900Global (and AMF) like to point out - "
Core dynamics must be taken into account with shell strength when selecting equipment."
None of us would have known that the Break S75 was a "soaker" unless they came out and told us. The only clue is from the description "The Break S75 shell is more aggressive, featuring a new absorbent coverstock technology designed to move oil rapidly away from the surface, enhancing an already high friction coverstock."
They can't use "soaker" because they don't own the rights to that name......which really surprises me that they didn't attempt to create a new trademark/copyright name for the cover and/or technology.
As stated before, "soaker" is considered a "super cover" with the benefit that it seems to get stronger with use - the opposite of most oil absorbing covers.
