win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Zen 25 Review  (Read 1558 times)

addynyr

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Zen 25 Review
« on: February 06, 2025, 02:27:48 PM »
Layout: 4 1/2 x 3 x 2
Surface: Power Edge
Rev Rate: 470
Rotation: 60*
Tilt: 13*

The Zen 25 is the newest rendition of the original popular Zen series this time with AI technology.  The Zen 25 uses the Meditate AI core paired with the new RB 83 Pearl coverstock and finished with Power Edge polish.  This combination gives a slightly earlier read and more down lane motion than the original Zen.  The Zen 25 is unmistakable in terms of its great presence on the lane and on the shelf.  The red, black and silver color scheme really makes this ball pop.  I was able to test this on my 44ft typical house shot.

On my house pattern, I saw ample mid lane roll and strong continuous and angular backend.  From this ball reaction, it is best used during the transition game 2 and/or game 3 when there is more overall friction.  This ball reaction tends to be too responsive for the fresh but can work in the right environment.  One week, I tested the ball in league on the fresh, the ball reaction was close to being right but was slightly too angular for what I needed.  Ended up working great for games 2 and 3 opening up the lane more left to right.  The following week, I was on a pair with more overall friction and the ball was fantastic on the fresh.  The lanes started as if it were game 2 essentially so was able to blend the lane more consistently.  I think the best place to use the Zen 25 on the fresh is for more medium length or medium oil volume environments.  Long patterns and high volume make the ball have trouble slowing down in the right spot.  Adding surface to the coverstock can of course make the ball read the lane earlier for those conditions.  I recommend this ball to anyone who loved the original Zen and wants a replacement, those looking for a first transition angular ball or those who just like to see more of that angular backend motion.  Comparing this to the Storm Phaze AI, I saw the Phaze a little cleaner overall with more angular motion.  The coverstock strength of the Zen 25 makes the ball read the midlane stronger with more of a continuous backend.  I can see the ability of having both balls in the bag on lane conditions that require more angular motions overall.  The Zen 25 would be first out of the bag followed by the Phaze AI.

Adam Chase
Storm Staff
Adam Chase
Storm Regional Staff
Vise Regional Staff
Bowlifi Regional Staff
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@adamchasebowling

 

allstation

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Zen 25 Review
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2025, 04:01:08 AM »
Did the Zen 25 demonstrated ample mid-lane roll with a strong, continuous, and angular backend?
“Do what you love, love what you do, and with all your heart give yourself to it.”― Sprunki Retake

addynyr

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 124
Re: Zen 25 Review
« Reply #2 on: February 19, 2025, 02:40:09 PM »
Certainly, a little more continuous than angular but I think it accomplishes that.
Adam Chase
Storm Regional Staff
Vise Regional Staff
Bowlifi Regional Staff
YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/@adamchasebowling

Jesse James

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3622
Re: Zen 25 Review
« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2025, 08:29:32 PM »
I saw this ball on the fresh shot last week. I was not responsive at all! And it did not remind me of the original Zen.

I was scratching my head trying to figure out what they were actually trying to accomplish with this piece.

I have two original Zens. They are rounder with late angularity down lane, which for me is excellent. I did not see that with this newer Zen.

Maybe layout change and some surface change might help.
Some days you're the bug....some days you're the windshield...that's bowling!