win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: A.M.F. Changeling ?  (Read 7307 times)

Mike E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
A.M.F. Changeling ?
« on: November 07, 2006, 11:34:02 AM »
Anybody know or have experience with this ball? I know it's Superflex with the Triumph core but I was wondering about R.G. and differential?

                                Thanks,
                                Mike E
--------------------
Did you know that you can't see pigs in a windstorm?
Logged

 

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2006, 08:00:40 PM »
If it's actually got the Triumph core, it'll have basically the same RG and diff.  The covers shouldn't make a significant difference.

But with Changelings, there's no telling what it is unless the box tells you.

SH
Logged

DukeHarding

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5855
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2006, 08:51:52 PM »
Ball is not approved for USBC use. I had one...which I loved, and couldn't use.
--------------------
Duke Harding


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bowling Coaches Web Site Link

Enjoy These Vintage Bowling Photos!
Logged

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2006, 09:08:26 PM »
quote:
Ball is not approved for USBC use. I had one...which I loved, and couldn't use.
--------------------
Duke Harding



Yes, It is approved... unless there was a recent banning of this ball.  The Bonanza 2's and 3's are the one's not approved.
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
Logged

Mike E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 528
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #4 on: November 08, 2006, 05:45:19 PM »
Thanks for the replies. I looked it up and it said it was approved June 04. What I was wondering was how aggressive was it? Could you compare it to anything? I just don't want to drill it wrong.

                                   Thanks,
                                   Mike E
--------------------
Did you know that you can't see pigs in a windstorm?
Logged

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #5 on: November 08, 2006, 08:03:04 PM »
quote:
Thanks for the replies. I looked it up and it said it was approved June 04. What I was wondering was how aggressive was it? Could you compare it to anything? I just don't want to drill it wrong.

                                   Thanks,
                                   Mike E


These balls apparently react very much like they are drilled.  Skid-snap layouts do skid and snap, early rolling layouts roll pretty early.  They are as aggressive as you make them.  

Too much over under?  Take some polish off the ball, etc...
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
Logged

hskrntx

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 498
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #6 on: November 08, 2006, 08:10:00 PM »
At one time I had four of them, all drilled different.  And they do react based on how you drill them.  And the surface adjusts quite well too.  Don't be afraid to get one, they're good balls.
--------------------
Semper Fi! AMForce Rocks!
Logged

bigearv14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2006, 09:11:20 PM »
as far as RG and diff...i believe the core is identical to the TNT core, so i believe the RG is 2.469 and the diff is .055...i had two at one time and would love to get another one, but i think my orbit extreme filled that spot!
--------------------
When having trouble, just throw it harder!!!
Logged

RealBowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 722
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2006, 12:03:23 PM »
Is there any way to tell which way the core is mounted in the ball?

The Triumph is inverted, but same (similar) core in the Terminal Velocity is opposite.

Would it really make a difference?
--------------------
Haywood

**************************
I don't need a stupid
signature. This is enough.
**************************
Logged

qstick777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5188
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #9 on: December 02, 2006, 10:57:17 AM »
quote:
as far as RG and diff...i believe the core is identical to the TNT core, so i believe the RG is 2.469 and the diff is .055...i had two at one time and would love to get another one, but i think my orbit extreme filled that spot!
--------------------
When having trouble, just throw it harder!!!


Is it that close to the OE?  

I have both waiting to be drilled, but can't decided which one to drill.  I've had the Changeling for over a year, and just got the OE.  Can't decide whether to use the FIFO or LIFO method.  The OE will still be under warranty while the Changeling isn't.  I don't expect any problems with either one.

On a side note, are they still making the Changeling?
--------------------
Best post ever:http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5

Search Ballreviews entire database here: http://www.bowling-info.com/Search.html
Logged

bigearv14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #10 on: December 03, 2006, 12:39:36 AM »
Honestly, the OE hooks more than advertised. The Changeling did have a stronger backend, but similar length and reaction shape...I could easily play down-and-in or swing the lane with both. Long run, both are light-medium pearl balls, so I think they are similar regardless of core dynamics, but I'm sure stuff will differ...

But go with the FIFO method...the Changeling does have a better core in my opinion and hits like a tank, while the OE is more of a mixer, in my book!
--------------------
When having trouble, just throw it harder!!!
Logged

qstick777

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5188
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #11 on: December 03, 2006, 09:34:21 AM »
quote:
Honestly, the OE hooks more than advertised. The Changeling did have a stronger backend, but similar length and reaction shape...I could easily play down-and-in or swing the lane with both. Long run, both are light-medium pearl balls, so I think they are similar regardless of core dynamics, but I'm sure stuff will differ...

But go with the FIFO method...the Changeling does have a better core in my opinion and hits like a tank, while the OE is more of a mixer, in my book!
--------------------
When having trouble, just throw it harder!!!


Thanks!

I ended up getting the OE drilled up yesterday - wife said it drill it because it was "prettier" than the Changeling!  Drilled it label.  There was probably a little bit too much oil for the ball, but it reacted as I expected - nice smooth arc.  If my league continues to use a lighter shot, I think this ball will be perfect.

Ball is very controllable.  I did notice that if I cranked it it would respond.

Very smooth ball, and it had really good pin action.

I think I'll drill the Changeling a little more aggressive and use that to play with the surface a little bit.
--------------------
Best post ever:http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5

Search Ballreviews entire database here: http://www.bowling-info.com/Search.html
Logged

bigearv14

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1545
Re: A.M.F. Changeling ?
« Reply #12 on: December 04, 2006, 04:18:30 AM »
yeah...that's what i lioke about the ball as well, you get to decide what it does. it has the capability to play near any line on a typical house shot.

man, i gotta get my hand on a changeling, but i just got a SJP, so i may not need it, but i did love that ball! i'd go pin up on that ball...use that cover and strong core!
--------------------
When having trouble, just throw it harder!!!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »