win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Radar vs. Radar Lock  (Read 2496 times)

JS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1284
Radar vs. Radar Lock
« on: June 21, 2006, 09:14:06 AM »
Looking at the Radar Lock it appears to also be a pearl reactive cover just as the Radar.  Anyone know what the difference between Mach 1 and Mach 2 reactive is?  What can we expect reaction wise from the Lock that is different from the Radar?
Logged

 

EricThomas

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 319
Re: Radar vs. Radar Lock
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2006, 06:30:48 PM »
The Lock has a lower RG (2.48) and a higher Diff (0.054) which will make it more aggressive off the "spot".  Mach II is a stronger version of the same coverstock used on the Radar and Max Velocity.  The Lock is going to read the heads clean but will start up earlier and react harder when compared to the Radar.
--------------------
AMF300 Account Manager
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Radar vs. Radar Lock
« Reply #2 on: July 04, 2006, 12:26:22 PM »
quote:
The Lock has a lower RG (2.48) and a higher Diff (0.054) which will make it more aggressive off the "spot".  Mach II is a stronger version of the same coverstock used on the Radar and Max Velocity.  The Lock is going to read the heads clean but will start up earlier and react harder when compared to the Radar.
--------------------
AMF300 Account Manager


Just saw the new issue of BTM. Their comparison indicates the same thing in their testing,

BUT they say the Radar Lock's Mach 2 coverstock is a solid, while the Radar is a pearl. The Lock is made for more oil (another degree or so) than the Radar.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »