BallReviews

Equipment Boards => AMF => Topic started by: Shaggy on March 09, 2005, 01:45:05 PM

Title: Evo vs Evo Tour II
Post by: Shaggy on March 09, 2005, 01:45:05 PM

How does the Evolution compare to the Evolution Tour II?  Are they the same ball?
--------------------
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!

Title: Re: Evo vs Evo Tour II
Post by: Shaggy on March 10, 2005, 06:42:33 AM

Based on the specs both balls have the SPT II coverstock which is particle.
--------------------
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!

Title: Re: Evo vs Evo Tour II
Post by: ptommy on March 10, 2005, 07:40:47 PM

One is reactive and one is particle

Title: Re: Evo vs Evo Tour II
Post by: Shaggy on March 10, 2005, 08:49:34 PM

There is an Angle Evolution Reactive, but I was trying to compare the original Angle Evolution (SPT II particle coverstock) to the Angle Evolution Tour II (SPT II particle coverstock).
--------------------
You will not see me on the PBA Tour, but I love the game!!!

Edited on 3/10/2005 9:45 PM

Title: Re: Evo vs Evo Tour II
Post by: LuckyLefty on March 15, 2005, 09:10:52 AM

Tour II

http://www.bowlingballreviews.com/ball.asp?ballid=377

Tour

http://www.bowlingballreviews.com/ball.asp?ballid=26

Regular Evolution

http://www.bowlingballreviews.com/ball.asp?ballid=1020

When I look at the stats above I see Tour II is saying diff of .50
Tour (with solid particle) is saying (diff.39) and Regular Evo is saying diff of .48.

But for some reason I thought the tour II was the same core as tour .39 and had a particle pearl vs the original tours dull particle(for heavy oil).

If I'm right Tour II just like the Tour should be a pretty angular ball where the Evolution was a pretty smooth mass bias ball!

REgards,

Luckylefty
PS if I'm right
PPS I bet Hammer Truck would know!