SO, let me got this right.
1. The BW is a great ball
2. The Break matches up well to it, and in fact, covers the heavier condition better in both balls O.O.B. finish
3. The Break has recieved the higherst rating ever from BTM magazine.
4. Katel likes the BW.
Sounds to me like you've got two really good balls here. Being no two balls are IDENTICAL, one has to be a little different at something, so the break is better ( a bit ) on heavier conditions, in box finish, that the BW.
Given that the Break is just new and out on the market, curiosity will be high as to what it is comparable to. From all this, I gather that, once again, Phil has proven his ability to design and produce a top-notch, perofrmance ball that is going to be comparable to one of the so called "established" best balls on the market. In fact, the "Ball of the Year" for 2006.
Not bad for an initial release, huh? Wonder what he will produce with a little more practice?
?
--------------------
THIS SPACE FOR RENT(\ /)
( . .)
c(')(')My Bowl.com member page