BallReviews
Equipment Boards => AMF => Topic started by: Ric Clint on October 14, 2009, 06:18:37 PM
-
I read in another post that the Bounty Hunter has 3% Particle Load... I didn''t even know the Bounty Hunter was Particle, I thought it was Reactive judging by what 900Global''s website says and what BTM Mag says...
http://www.900global.com/BountyHuntermagic8.pdf
So I was just wondering, what is the Particle Load % of the Mega Friction?
And does the Bounty Hunter have a similar Oil Absorbtion rate as the Break S75 (the Absorbent Coverstock technology that is designed to move oil rapidly away from the surface)?
Edited on 10/15/2009 2:39 AM
-
As far as i can remember should be 6%, sorry no idea on the oil absorbtion rate...
Sam
-
I believe you are correct Sam, 6% load
--------------------
Steve
Leading Edge Pro Shop
steve@leadingedgeproshop.net
512-755-2947
http://stores.shop.ebay.com/Leading-Edge-Pro-Shop__W0QQ_armrsZ1
-
yes, Mega was 6%
3% light load i believe on the BH......
as for oil absorbtion, i cant say if it has soaker or not, don't know , but just for kicks, we have stuck a couple of our own bounty hunters in the "easy bake oven" at the shop and havent seen very much oil come out of them at all.
More came out of the clutch 
-
I would guess that at least 90% of reactive balls have particles added, they just don't call them "particle covers" anymore.
-
Obviously I'm not Steve, but I am under the impression that the Mega is a med-high particle load...
--------------------
(616) 690-0590
surface_solutions_proshop@yahoo.com