Ball: Brunswick C-(System) 2.5Layout:Pin 5†from PAP below fingers
45-degree locator line angle
(Dual-angle: 45 by 5†by 70)
XH on VAL, 2†below PAP, 7/8†by 2†deep
Initial Surface Preparation:Box finish
Purpose:To bridge the gap between the Wild Ride/Wild Thing and the “Snake†balls. More specifically, to get recovery from the friction on conditions where the Wilds are burning up, but where there isn’t quite enough dry for the Rattler and Python to make the turn in back.
Why this ball?The intent of the CFG 2.5 coverstock that is used on the C-(System) 2.5 is to provide a stronger reaction to friction than what is currently available in the Brunswick line. When combined with a moderately strong asymmetric core, it seemed to me that the C-(S) could give me the reaction shape that I was seeking.
Observations:The first time I used the C-(System) 2.5 was at a center with five-year-old Pro Anvilanes, on a pair of lanes that had been used for a qualifying squad for an ABT tournament. I warmed up with the Rattler, and as long as I didn’t get the ball too wide of target, I had a good look at the pocket. I then switched to the C-(S), and found my best look from eight-and-four left of where I had started. From there, the C-(S) was creating some hold for me, while still recovering nicely from the house track.
I’ve used the C-(System) at the same center in a second-shift league. Typically, I don’t like to use pin-down equipment in this league, for while there is plenty of free hook to the outside, the condition tends to favor a more direct trajectory to the pocket. The C-(S) has been clean enough through the front part of the lane to allow me to play the lanes in this fashion, though, while still having enough strength in the back part of the lane to give me a good carry angle.
I’ve also used this ball several times at a center with HPL in front and older wood in back, on a fresh condition with fairly high volume in front and clean back ends. On this condition, the C-(System) was really at home, as I could get my feet left and align myself to the dry boards, and not have to worry about whether the ball would recover. Even on shots where I missed right, the C-(S) retained well enough to finish strong and carry the corners.
Conclusions:Usually, when I have a ball that is strong off of friction, it doesn’t do so well at riding an oil line, and vice versa. The C-(System) 2.5 gives me the best of both worlds, and in addition, it has that strong look through the pin deck that the Wilds and the Python have. In addition, this ball seems to get better and better as I go deeper on the lane I’ve yet to encounter an inside limitation with the C-(S).
The C-(S) doesn’t seem to break the lane down quite as quickly as balls such as the Radical Inferno and Wild Ride have for me, and the C-(S) doesn’t read transition quite as abruptly.
While I had originally viewed the C-(System) 2.5 as a ball to take me from the Wilds to the Snakes, I’m finding that, on conditions with enough friction to allow me to give away the pocket, I can stay with the C-(S) and keep following the transition deeper inside.
NOTE: The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com