Ball: Brunswick DiamondbackLayout:Pin 5†from PAP, below ring finger
CG ¾†below and ¾†to right of grip center
No XH
Initial Surface Preparation:Box finish
Purpose:To fill the benchmark spot in the tournament bag. I have a couple of Copperheads that I’ve been using as bench pieces, and while they’ve served me reasonably well in this role, I’ve been looking for something that not only could be used to read a lane, but would also be strong enough to stay with as the condition transitions. I’ve also tried a Rattler in this spot, but I’ve been hoping to find something that would handle more oil.
Why this ball?The solid Activator cover on the Diamondback has proven to be versatile, and I’ve always gotten consistent reactions from the lower-RG Rocket core. Also, for whatever reason, I’ve always had better luck with benchmark balls that have had solid covers.
Observations:The first time I threw the Diamondback was at a center with five-year-old Pro Anvilane, in a second-shift league. The pair we drew that night has been playing tighter than the other pairs in the league, and getting the right midlane read has been tricky. However, the Diamondback handled this condition extremely well, blending out the lane from front to back and side to side. It read the oil without squirting, and from the dry, it made a defined move to the pocket without jerking or over-bouncing. We did encounter quite a bit of transition during the set, but I was able to follow the oil line inward without losing recovery. I didn’t seem to have the same inside limitation that I’ve experienced with the Copperhead, as the ball continued to finish strong and kick the corners as I moved in.
I’ve also used the Diamondback at a center with HPL in front and older wood in back, on a fresh house condition. The Diamondback read the friction in such a way that I could get my feet further left, allowing me to hook around the push, and keeping me further away from the burn in front. I did have to make several lateral moves over the course of the set, but I was able to do so without losing my angle to the pocket.
Conclusions:I wasn’t quite sure what to expect with the Diamondback. With the Snake line (as with the BVP line before it), the stronger pieces have been more even in nature, while the angular balls have been weaker overall. So you could imagine how pleased I was the first time I got the Diamondback wide of target, and saw the way that it came roaring back to the pocket.
It’s hard for me to draw a comparison between the Diamondback and other recent Brunswick releases. It’s not quite like the Ultimate Inferno remake, because the Diamondback doesn’t need to get all the way to the dry in order to make a defined turn down lane. It’s also not quite like a scuffed Rattler, because the move that the Diamondback makes at the break is noticeably stronger. The Diamondback definitely gives me a look that I don’t have in the bag right now, and that I haven’t seen in the mid-price line in quite a while.
NOTE: The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com