Layout:Pin 5†from PAP below fingers
45-degree locator line angle
(Dual-angle: 45 by 5†by 75)
XH on VAL, 1 1/2†below PAP, 7/8†by 2†deep
Initial Surface Preparation:Box finish
Purpose:To bridge the gap between my Siege/Evil Siege and my C-(System) 2.5/3.5. The Sieges tend to work best for me on conditions where I can play more direct and that break down in parallel lines, while the C-(System) balls are better when I need to give the ball more room and rely on recovery.
Why this ball?With the higher-RG version of the MACE core, along with the more aggressive Propel X cover, I felt that the Wicked Siege would give me a look that was clean through the front and strong at the break while still maintaining the front-to-back control of the earlier Siege balls.
Observations:I drilled a Wicked Siege with a pin that was right about 2†from the CG, using a pin-under layout with the pin at 5†from PAP and a 45-degree locator line angle.
I first used the Wicked on a fresh house condition at a center with a new SPL lane surface. This center tends toward lower volumes and higher friction to the outside and in back, so I really didn’t think that I’d be able to use this ball on this condition. It wasn’t until my weaker equipment began to labor down lane that I went back to the Wicked, and at that point, I was surprised at how adept the Wicked was at blending out the condition. The look in front was similar to that of the Siege, but was cleaner, while the back end reaction was more angular and continuous, with noticeable strength through the pin deck. The Wicked was also moving pins around in a manner similar to what I’d seen from the C-(System) balls.
I’ve also used the Wicked on a second-shift condition at a center with older Pro Anvilanes, with mixed success. This center tends to favor more direct angles, so on the tighter pairs, I’ve been able to find a good carry angle by squaring up and playing closer to the oil line. On pairs with more noticeable breakdown, though, the Wicked was giving me too strong of a reaction early, and thus I was forced deep enough to where I couldn’t get the recovery or back end reaction that I needed.
Conclusions:I’ve noticed that, when it comes to the asymmetrical balls in the Brunswick lineup, the bowlers I know have tended to favor either the Sieges or the C-(System) balls. The Siege and Evil Siege seem to like to be played more direct, while the C-(S) 2.5 and 3.5 are at their best when given room to the outside. The Wicked Siege strikes a balance between the two—and the Wicked definitely will strike. I’ve had success with it going direct, as well as sending it from the oil to the dry. In addition, I’ve found that the Wicked does not break down a lane condition nearly as quickly as the C-(System) balls can.
I could easily see the Wicked Siege filling that “first ball out of the bag†spot for most higher-average bowlers. The Wicked is clean in front and strong and continuous down lane without being too abrupt at the turn. Serious tournament players will want the Wicked in their bag for those conditions where the Siege or Evil Siege aren’t quite enough in back, but where the C-(System) balls are too sharp down lane.
NOTE: The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com