Ball: Brunswick Wild ThingLayout:Pin 5 ½†from PAP, on centerline below fingers
CG ½†below and ½†to right of of grip center
No XH
Initial Surface Preparation:Box finish
Purpose:To fill the “strong pearl†spot in the bag, and give me a more angular reaction on medium conditions, much like what I used to get with the Absolute Inferno. I have a pin-above Copperhead that I’ve been using in this spot, but the Copperhead tends to be lazier at the break, and prefers a more direct trajectory. The Rattler is sharper at the break for me, but needs a defined dry area in order to be effective.
Why this ball?The combination of a Connexion cover with a lower-RG symmetrical core seemed to make the Wild Thing a good choice for a more lateral look on medium house-type conditions.
Observations:The Wild Thing that I got had a 1 ½†pin and 1.9 ounces of top weight. I was tempted to put the pin in the ring finger, but I decided instead to go with a pin-down layout with a longer pin-to-PAP distance.
I first used the Wild Thing in league at a center with HPL in front and older wood in back, on a fresh house condition. In box finish, the Wild Thing was particularly adept at evening out the reaction from front to back. When I got it in the oil, it didn’t squirt, and when I got it wide of target into the dry, it made a moderate move without jumping. However, as the fronts started to go, and the oil began to push, I was forced inside to where the ball wouldn’t quite corner. So to try to get some help in front and a better look at the break, I took the Wild Thing down to 320 smooth on six sides, and applied Brunswick’s Factory Finish High Gloss polish on six sides, and tried it at the same center the following week, and this seemed to make all the difference. The Wild Thing showed no skittishness in front, even as the condition broke down, and the reaction at the break was significantly stronger. I was able to follow the shot to the inside without losing my carry angle.
Conclusions:The first time I threw the Wild Thing, the reaction that I was getting was much like what I had with the Total Inferno a few years back, most notably in the smoothness of the transition off of the end of the pattern. However, I did see a few significant differences. First, while I was able to get some additional length and sharpness at the break by polishing the Total Inferno, the difference was much more dramatic with the Wild Thing. Second, even with a polished surface, the Total Inferno seemed to have an inside limitation for me, as I couldn’t get very far left without losing recovery at the break. I don’t seem to have this problem with the Wild Thing. Third, the Wild Thing goes through the pins much better than the Total Inferno ever did for me.
With the polished surface, I believe that the Wild Thing will fill the gap that I have in the tournament bag. I can now use my Wild Ride on tighter conditions or when I need to ride the oil line, and the Wild Thing when I want to open up the dry. I’m now tempted to try to get my hands on a Wild Thing with a longer pin, as I think I’d be able to use a bit more surface while still getting a reasonably strong breakpoint shape.
NOTE: The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com