BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: thedjs on September 30, 2004, 09:17:44 AM
-
If so, what do you think would be similar in the current Brunswick line?
Thanks,
-
i would say that the ball would be pretty similar to the monster bruiser dulled down........... i had a rhino le and i'll tell u u need some head oil for this one....
--------------------
you can laugh at the way i bowl but i will be the one laughin when i am takin your money
-
that sounds like a idea
I am going to get my LE
out of the basement try it
tonight havn't used it in years
did shoot a 299 with it year
it was new.
Never hurts to try the old stuff
sometimes.
Rex
-
i had an unsanctioned 300 with mine right after i got it 2 years ago...... i got it new from a fellow ballreviews memeber..... i would still be throwing it today if the lane machines wouldnt have mutilated it one league night.... totally butcherd my track...... its ok, i like my infernos just as much as that ball....
--------------------
you can laugh at the way i bowl but i will be the one laughin when i am takin your money
-
used it last night like I said
hit just as good as a new ball
left a solid 8 pin !
and we won 2 games was on lanes 1&2
and scores are low anyway shot 199.
-
i never owned a rhino pro le but i had several johnny petraglia lt-48 golds and they shared the same weightblock. the lt-48 had a more aggressive reactive coverstock( powrkoil 18 ). this weightblock design is not being used by brunswick at this time( too bad i think ).