BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: killpins on November 13, 2008, 05:29:15 AM
-
Hi
Are There differences between the avalanche pearl and the Dry Zone Solid?
Anyone throw these balls? Any info about hese two balls is appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
-
I know nothing about the Dry Zone solid.
However, the difference in general is that pearls go longer and turn harder late. Solids tend to react earlier on the lane and be more smooth at the break point.
--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Amateur Staff
www.brunswickbowling.com
-
quote:
Im pretty sure the Dry Zone has Activator coverstock. Hard to imagine it being weak.
--------------------
Pretty girls make us buy beer...
Ugly girls make us drink beer...."Al Bundy"
From Brunswick's Dry Zone web page:
We start by using a newly redesigned Light Bulb Core shape with a medium RG rating and then encase the core with Activator - 5 coverstock. This combination of a low flare potential core system and Brunswick's most forgiving low friction coverstock will make the Dry Zone Solid the ball of choice for many bowlers who encounter high hooking lane conditions and short oil patterns.
http://www.brunswickbowling.com/dry-zone-solid?noCache=22:1226613584
From BowlingBall.com:
Brunswick Dry Zone Solid - Overseas Release - bowlingball.com Exclusive $119.99
Avalanche Pearl: $78.99
Other than performance, there's a $40 difference in price on the internet.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
-
quote:
my av solid is pretty weak and pk 18 isnt that much weaker than activator
--------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGs6ULm2ZA8
PK 18 is completely different from Activator.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
-
Some Dry Zones (pearl and solid) are around here. The pearl goes very long and is a smooth piece, but definitely stronger than the AvP, due to the Activator cover.
The DZS is a different thing. While it is called "Dry", it is much more of a control piece, a little like MoRich's Solid LevRG. Take a solid reactive cover that handles a good amount of oil, add a sheen finish and a low flare core, and you have a very good piece for spotty lanes on medium-dry to medium-oily conditions. Great choice if you are a down-and-in player or rev-challenged. But definitively no true dry lane ball... IMO, the DZS is even stronger than the AvS, in every aspect.
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
-
thanks to all.