Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Brunswick
»
Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes (Read 837 times)
Buckwild
Hero Member
Posts: 1038
Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes
«
on:
October 08, 2009, 02:25:20 AM »
If you had a choice between these two, which would you rather use on wooden lanes that are old, with a medium to medium-dry shot as it breaks down?
Logged
Guest
Re: Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes
«
Reply #1 on:
October 08, 2009, 11:40:37 AM »
I'd probably opt for the Rattler. I like the cover a bunch and it should read the friction more smoothly. Wood lanes can be very quirky so predictable pearl covers do well for me.
--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff
www.brunswickbowling.com
The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
Logged
RSalas
Hero Member
Posts: 4058
Re: Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes
«
Reply #2 on:
October 08, 2009, 11:46:44 AM »
I guess it depends on how you like to play conditions like that.
I tend to use my Rattler more when I can chase the oil line inside, because it tends to be smoother from front to back for me. In contrast, the Smash Zone (and now the Python) is more lateral at the break, and thus is better for me when I have to go more left-to-right and hook around the down-lane push.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
Logged
#TweetYourScores
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Brunswick
»
Rattler vs Smash Zone on old wood lanes