win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid  (Read 7198 times)

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid
« on: May 17, 2014, 07:23:29 PM »

Low battery so I only got in a few shots while getting warmed up. Not bowled in three weeks so the rust is awesome.

Ball is drilled 70 x 2.5" x 50 with a x-hole 2" down my val. Ball is stronger then expected but something I am very pleased with. Likely to add a second one later.

Great ball to have with either the Red or the Platinum Ringer.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

 

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid
« Reply #16 on: May 24, 2014, 12:43:57 PM »
The Ringer Solid looks super smooth and even - perfect for fresh medium/dry patterns!
I also like the 2.5" layouts on low-mid range stuff for squaring up my angles when there is a little friction on both house patterns and playing outside on sport.

Kid, did you add any surface to your Ringer or is it in box finish?  How does it compare to your Melee?

Left it at box surface. (this is my actual first shots with the ball) Considering touching it up just a hair with some more 2000 grit. The ball is strong. It isn't viable in the vid but the ball really starts hooking sooner and really continues well down lane. Very typical with other balls I have tried this layout on. It is actually a few small steps down from the Beatdown on the same layout actually.

Compared to the Melee it is sooner, and overall stronger. I did not like the Melee because it was just to speed sensitive, and surface adjustments never really helped. The LT48 is what I expected in reaction from the Melee honestly. I looked forward to adding another Ringer Solid on a 60 x 5 x 60 type layout for a smoother later reaction.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2014, 01:08:52 PM by kidlost2000 »
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Brandon Riley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1157
Re: Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2014, 03:15:10 PM »
That is exactly what I was hoping to hear.  I could totally see the solid Ringer and LT48 being a great 1-2 for medium - medium/dry lanes
Brandon Riley
Brunswick Regional Staff

JohnP

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5819
Re: Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2014, 04:28:44 PM »
Kidlost,

I know you have a lot of contact with Mo Pinel.  Is that his position that Drill angle on symmetrics doesn't matter?


It doesn't really appear from the drill sheets at Radical that his position is really that, but I would like to know more.  Certain drillings seem to be ambiguous whether a weighthole will be necessary and yet different reaction characteristics are discussed.

Please advise?

REgards,

Luckylefty

I've followed the discussions on bowling chat.  For all balls it's the post-drilled drilling angle that affects the ball's roll.  For asymmetrical cores the post-drilled psa will be very close to the marked psa, so the drilling angle is meaningful.  For symmetrical cores the post-drilled psa is close to the thumb hole, so the drilling angle is not meaningful other than to place the cg for use of balance holes.  Addition of a balance hole pulls the psa toward the balance hole, to pull it the furthest (thus reducing the post-drilled psa) and stay safe from rolling over the balance hole, use a hole 2" down the VAL from its intersection with the grip midline.  When I drill symmetrical balls I use the old pin to PAP and pin to cg method to locate the PAP in a position for desired flare and side weight to allow a balance hole if so desired, then draw the line from the pin through the PAP and apply the desired VAL angle to set the grip.  I've found this works very well.  --  JohnP

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Brunswick Ringer Solid Royal short vid
« Reply #19 on: May 24, 2014, 04:34:13 PM »
Great post JP
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.