win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: What are the difference between the two different pearl avalanches and why did they change it?  (Read 2466 times)

danprince10

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
I remember when the avalanches first came out. That blue and white/silver pearl well I thought it was the best looking ball while rolling down the lane on the market at its time.I was out of bowling for maybe a year and a half or 2 years. And the solid is still exactly the same, but the pearl one is like black and green now and the specs are slightly different. What did it do to the balls hook amount and shape and why the change? I almost wanna pick up one of those blue silver ones just because it was such a good looking ball, I even liked what it did but it's too similar to my power groove to really be a necessity, and they're only going to get harder to come by as time goes on...

Arsenal 
 
Brunswick Power Groove
 
Roto Grip Cell Pearl 
 
Brunswick Target Zone 

 

Brandon Riley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1157
I spent a lot of time bowling on some very dry lane conditions while I was away at college and have thrown a lot of Avalanches and a Groove.  I had 2x Blue/Silver Avalanche Pearls (pin up, pin down) and 3x Green/Black Avalanche Pearls (pin up, pin below middle, pin below bridge), and a Powergroove (pin up), so I have some valid input here.

 

The Blue/Silver used a pearl version of the NControl Coverstock which is very tame, but good for dry and medium-dry lane conditions.  It didn't require much oil to hold line to the pocket and was effective on flatter, dry patterns allowing the bowler to play more direct angles.   When swinging the ball, I found the Blue/Silver to be a little touchy, but was great for playing the track. 

 

The Green/Black uses a pearl version of the Powerkoil 18 coverstock (same as the Danger Zone Black Ice if I recall, which is a pearl DZ).  The Green/Black's stronger cover allows the bowler the option of playing through a little more oil and provides a little more bite through carrydown making it useful on a wider range of conditions.  It is simply just a little more ball, but the core/cover combo at least in my opinion match up great!

 

When I got my first Green/Black drilled I also had a Powergroove punched up with the same layout.  I found that at the same finish, the Green/Black was 3-4 boards stronger, beginning to roll a little more in the midlane and having much more backend recovery.  The Blue/Silver rolls slightly sooner than the powergroove, but overall they are very similar bowling balls.



Brandon Riley


 


Brunswick Advisory Staff


The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
 
Edited by Brandon Riley on 03/02/2011 at 3:08 AM
Brandon Riley
Brunswick Regional Staff

  • Guest

I would agree with Brandon that the green/black Avalanche is stronger. For me, it's the one ball from that line that gets used the most.

 

 


Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff

www.brunswickbowling.com

The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
I have a couple of Avalanches, the Green/Black and the Slide. I believe the major reasons for the change to the PK 18 pearl cover was that the original pearl was too skid/flippy and was too far from the Solid. Once the Avalanche Slide came out several months later, it was a much better ball for light oil than the pearl. The Green/Black is stronger and more even reacting and was a better fit in the sequence from Solid to Pearl to Slide, handling medium oil, medium-light and light oil very well.

"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"Some bowlers are crazy as pickled cats."
 
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606

 



charlest wrote on 03.02.2011 7:04 AM:I have a couple of Avalanches, the Green/Black and the Slide. I believe the major reasons for the change to the PK 18 pearl cover was that the original pearl was too skid/flippy and was too far from the Solid. Once the Avalanche Slide came out several months later, it was a much better ball for light oil than the pearl. The Green/Black is stronger and more even reacting and was a better fit in the sequence from Solid to Pearl to Slide, handling medium oil, medium-light and light oil very well.

"None are so blind as those who will not see."


"Some bowlers are crazy as pickled cats."

 
Second that impression. While the N'control cover family needs only little oil in the heads, the breakpoint was/is pretty erratic, because the cover responds quickly to friction. A friend of mine had one and hated it right from the start, as well as a Punisher with the same cover. Personally, I had a MoRich Sahara with that cover, and it was a hit or miss for me. The PK18 pearl cover is overall stronger (read: offers more and earlier traction), and I think it is much more forgiving and less special than the N'Control cover. Not a popular cover - even in league some bowlers I talked with did not like it very much.

DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany