In general, particle vs resin is more like smoother vs flippier, BUT, and this is a big "BuT", there are so many
- different loads of particles,
- different polishes levels of particle, resin, particle pearls, resin pearls,
- different grit/sanding levels of the same ball coverstocks,
- asymmetric cores throw another level of complexity into the mix,
that it is no longer possible nor correct to draw conclusions based on whether the ball is particle or resin anymore. All other factors, some of which I specified above, must be taken into account.
Life in bowling is no longer simple and straightforward.The ball itself must be judged, not simply on its core, and not simply on its cover.
As an example that proves the rule, there are now particle balls, like the Scamp,
http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?ManufacterID=1&BallID=496which skids more and hooks less than almost any resin ball, and there are solid resins, like the Rule,
http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?ManufacterID=12&BallID=552that hook earlier and more than most particles now on the market.
--------------------
"When we choose an action,
we also choose the consequences of that action.