win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Dry/R vs Blue/Green Centaur  (Read 1972 times)

PowrKoil17

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 196
  • HG: 265 HS: 659 HA: 172
Dry/R vs Blue/Green Centaur
« on: June 20, 2011, 01:43:56 PM »
how do these two balls compare? I really love my Dry/R and I am curious about  the B/G Centaur.

Thank God my Son bowls so I can have a Hero!
 
Power Groove DryR
Red/Teal Pearl Power Groove
Sapphire Zone Pearl
Sapphire Zone Solid
Control Zone
My Arsenal                     Son's Arsenal (HG 267, HS 651, HA 177)
Black Hammer(Faball)    Red Zone
Ogre SS                          Mission 2.0
Dirty Look                      Evil Siege                      
Nexus                             C System 2.5
C System 2.5

 

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4361
Re: Dry/R vs Blue/Green Centaur
« Reply #1 on: June 21, 2011, 06:13:37 AM »
The Centaur is definitely going to be stronger.  Even though the core is weak, the cover will make the difference here.  A closer comparison may be the Slingshot to the Centaur.  At box finish, the Centaur is weak, but very even rolling, almost urethane like.  Same with the Slingshot.  At box finish, even though it is a weak ball, it is not an angular ball.  The Dry/R is definitely more of a true dry lane ball.



Peace doesnt always have to be silent.
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Dry/R vs Blue/Green Centaur
« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2011, 06:18:33 AM »
  With its stock surface (light grey SB pad, approx 800 grit US/CAMI. Visionary calls it 1000 grit US/CAMI), the BG Centaur, for the avg revs, avg ball speed bowler, will handle light to medium-light  to just under medium oil.
 
The Dry/R covers the driest and lightest oil that a resin ball can handle.
 
To make the BGC equivalent to the Dry/R, you'd have to sand it to P4000 grit FEPA, and then add polish. To separate the two, you can take the BGC to P2000 grit  FEPA and leave it dull. Or take it finer for a little more length, say P4000 grit and leave it dull/matte. Or add light polish to the stock surface or polish over a P2000 grit surface. I have used all those surfaces and the BGC reacts to those slight changes.
 
If you have higher ball speed, you might want to stick to the rougher surfaces and you may not see each difference in grit level. If you have medium to lower ball speed, you'll more easily see all the differences.
 
The BGC has extremely little flare (RG Diff ~ .015", less than a pancake core) compared to the Dry/R and is a solid, vs the Dry/R's pearl. The BGC is also a control ball, without a doubt. It has the most urethane like reaction I have seen outside of the Lane#1 Bullet (very similar to the Dry/R).
 

"None are so blind as those who will not see."

 
 
Edited by charlest on 6/21/2011 at 6:19 AM
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7606
Re: Dry/R vs Blue/Green Centaur
« Reply #3 on: June 21, 2011, 08:30:57 AM »
Second CharlesT's impression: both are suitable, but way different balls. The Dry/R has a very mild cover, paired with a high RG and also a higher differential. I once had one for a short time, and it has been the weakest reactive I have used to date. The BGC is a solid reactive with a low differential core, which allows a stable and smooth breakpoint and overall hook. IMHO, its cover is stronger than the Dry/R, reading the lane earlier, but much more controllable, steadier. You might find both useful on similar conditions, but they are IMHO hard to compare and not real replacements for each other.


DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany