win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: RG's on Danger Zone?  (Read 1125 times)

MegaMav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
RG's on Danger Zone?
« on: December 21, 2007, 01:14:27 PM »
Min/Max?

If anyone has the numbers, that would be great.

Thanks,

Eric
--------------------
BowlingChat.net - "Welcome to the Underground"
BowlingWiki.net - "Where Bowlers Write History"
Logged

 

MegaMav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3409
Re: RG's on Danger Zone?
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2007, 09:24:17 PM »
2.516/2.563

Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: RG's on Danger Zone?
« Reply #2 on: December 22, 2007, 03:38:19 AM »
quote:
2.516"/2.563"



doesn't look right.

The "2.5" average Rich quoted was a relative number between 1 and 10., not an absolute as we measure RGs now. For instance, the Fire Quantum's average RG was 3.5. The LT-48 Gold was average RG was 1.7.  The Rhino Pro Teal was 2.7. The Sapphire Zone was also 2.5
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: RG's on Danger Zone?
« Reply #3 on: December 22, 2007, 02:12:52 PM »
quote:
Bracket Creep, I know you know.


All I know is what you told me back when the Bruiser was released, that being that the Bruiser was designed to have the same core specs as the Danger Zone.  However, I don't recall whether you said that this was true only for the 16s, or for the lighter weights as well.  Given that I throw 16, I probably wouldn't have thought to ask at the time.  
--------------------
...formerly "The Curse of Dusty," and "Poöter Boöf" before that...
Logged
#TweetYourScores
Pages: [1]
« previous next »