win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne  (Read 1603 times)

ginro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« on: March 31, 2008, 10:51:18 AM »
which of this two balls is better??
im a cranker with around 320 rpm 17-19 mph i need this ball for playing on a ths!!
UIA B.B.A
Bowlerx.com Staff
Utah products supporter
#StormNation #OwnIt

 

  • Guest
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2008, 07:04:37 PM »
Both are good, but the Ultra may match up better with your ball speed, etc.


--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Amateur Staff

Uncle Crusty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2008, 07:07:16 PM »
You seem a little speed dominant, so you may not see as much recovery as you would hope for with the Fury Pearl. So, I agree with notclay. You're probably gonna want the Ultra.
--------------------
"Nobody in the game of football should be called a genius. A genius is somebody like Norman Einstein."

-Broadcasting Extraordinaire and Mensa Member Joe Theismann

bhsbigcountry

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2008, 10:56:02 AM »
Yeah I agree. I liked the ultra better than the fury pearl. ultra is quite versitile and very controlable. just a question ur a cranker with only 320 rpm. I guess i just think of a cranker at over 400 or 450. I have right around 400 and am no where described as a cranker.
--------------------
Shawn

rhbowling07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 918
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2008, 04:44:26 PM »
ive heard better things about the ultra compared to the fp

wooddaddy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 186
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2008, 04:51:18 PM »
which of the two balls is better for what?

anything will work on a THS

RandyO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1213
Re: Fury Pearl or Ultra ZOne
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2008, 09:38:38 PM »
Not to mention the volume, lane surface, etc. There are some THS conditions where the FP would be a better choice.