win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Anaconda v. Python  (Read 2209 times)

wbltim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Anaconda v. Python
« on: December 04, 2010, 03:40:08 AM »
Just curious if anyone has thrown both of these.  I am considering each, so any insight you have would be cool.  Might as well throw the 2.5 into the mix as well.

I am pretty much a stroker and have had great success this year with the 3.5.  I am looking for a Brunswick ball that I can use later in the night if I need to.

Thanks for the help!

Tim
--------------------
299 - Roto SD-73 Classic
 299 - Elite Black Label
 298 - Roto SD-73
 297 - Brunswick C 3.5
 290 - Roto Rogue Cell

 

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: Anaconda v. Python
« Reply #1 on: December 04, 2010, 11:44:46 AM »
I guess it depends on how fast and how much your condition transitions.

For me, the Anaconda will handle more volume than the Python, but if the shot breaks down quickly, I'll have to go to the bag for something weaker.  In contrast, once I've switched to the Python, I can usually stay with it as long as there is oil that I can chase to the inside.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
#TweetYourScores

devildog819

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
Re: Anaconda v. Python
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2010, 09:45:51 AM »
For me, the Anaconda will transistion quicker due to the more aggressive cover than the Phyton. The Python can be used on a lighter condition or when the lanes break down.  All this is based on your rev rate, tilt, etc.  They are both good to have.
--------------------
Roger Harley, Jr
IBPSIA Certified Technician
USBC Bronze Coach
Brunswick Advisory Staff

***The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Bowling & Billards Corporation***

laufaye

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1602
Re: Anaconda v. Python
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2010, 10:21:05 AM »
Considering your request was looking for a ball in the later of the night IF YOU NEED TO, meaning sometimes you don't need to.  So I assume the Anaconda would be a better choice for you.
--------------------
Neil Lau
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff
VISE Staff Member
USBC Bronze Coach
IBPSIA Certified Technician
Owner of Super Bowl Pro Shop and Bowlers Junction, CA

wbltim

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Anaconda v. Python
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2010, 06:36:16 AM »
Thanks guys!  I'll report results whenever I pick something up.
--------------------
299 - Roto SD-73 Classic
 299 - Elite Black Label
 298 - Roto SD-73
 297 - Brunswick C 3.5
 290 - Roto Rogue Cell

notsohotshot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2623
Re: Anaconda v. Python
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2010, 09:40:48 AM »
At this point I sure would not overlook the new Damage !!!