Sweet Ball. I wasn't sure of what to expect from this ball. The Big-B specs make it out to be very similar to the Time Zone, with a slightly lower RG. Many of the posts I read made it sound weaker, and surprisingly there were a few who just didn't like it. Well - I LIKE IT. For comparison purposes, my Time Zone is layed out for length and big back end (pin over bridge, CG kicked right a bit, and it does just that - LONG and STRONG. Major-league back end - it never runs out of back end. With the solid PK18 cover, it doesn't like drying heads though.
I drilled the Bruiser with the intent of having an earlier reaction - more even, and less angularity. The ball is a 3" pin, and I laid it out with the Pin below and on right edge of the ring finger, with the CG stacked below. This is around a 5x5 layout for me. One observation that surprised me - the blue portion of the ball appears to be pearlized. Not dramatically, but it is noticeable. That might explain why some bowlers are experiencing a weaker reaction than they had expected. My home house isn't noted for having heavy oil - it's medium at best. Having pearlization is a good thing there. Anwway, the ball reacts just as I had hoped. More even than the TZ, and covers slightly less ground. This layout gives me around 3" of flare in the oil, and at least a couple of more inches as it completes it's journey. The hit and carry seem good - it didn't shatter any wood, but it carried every hit that I thought it should. The ball reminds me a LOT of my 16# Spirit, which was one of my all time favorite balls. Similar layout, and I'm getting similar results. Another plus, it doesn't over-react, and seemed a bit more forgiving of slight inconsistencies in release than the TZ. Early impressions lead me to believe that this is a ball that will 'stay in play' longer than the TZ. The TZ is a more 'dramatic' ball, having a bigger snap, and a more energetic effect on the pins, whereas the Bruiser is more predictable, and just gets the job done in an efficient manner.