win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: BVP Goliath VS BVP Mammoth  (Read 1353 times)

J_w73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
BVP Goliath VS BVP Mammoth
« on: December 31, 2008, 09:40:30 AM »
I had a BVP Goliath drilled leverage and it was a beast.  Gave it to my Dad but now I wish I had it.  I can't find one anywhere. How does the Mammoth compare?
Or is there anything else that might be as good

PAP 5 1/2 and 3/8 up
16-17 mph
350-475 revs.

Edited on 12/31/2008 6:41 PM
350 RPM, 17 MPH

 

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4361
Re: BVP Goliath VS BVP Mammoth
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2008, 05:45:40 PM »
The Mammoth is the replacement for the Goliath.  The Mammoth should be a little stronger overall. The Mammoth I believe had a little stronger core than what the Goliath had.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Pro Shop Operator
Striking Results Pro Shop
Red Carpet Lanes
Duluth (NE Atlanta), Georgia

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

J_w73

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2554
Re: BVP Goliath VS BVP Mammoth
« Reply #2 on: January 01, 2009, 12:35:00 PM »
quote:
The Mammoth uses Activator Particle coverstock, which is WAY more aggressive than the Goliath.  

The Mammoth is a snowtire .. it is the most aggrissive, earliest hooking ball I have ever owned.
--------------------
Righty
Speed: 16.5 (Quibica)
Revs: med-high to high (@400 RPM)
Axis: 5-3/4"  5/16 down

See Profile for arsenal


I was never a fan of the activator coverstock.. don't know if the activator particle is better...
I heard from a Brunswick rep that the Goliath is better/more hooking in oil than the mammoth.
350 RPM, 17 MPH