BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: PowrKoil17 on August 03, 2013, 10:30:20 AM

Title: Nexus Solid
Post by: PowrKoil17 on August 03, 2013, 10:30:20 AM
just bought a used low game Nexus Solid off of Ebay dirt cheap. hoping it will pair with my C System 2.5. I am expecting the Nexus to be longer and smoother than the 2.5. you can see the Nexus here:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/16-lb-Used-Brunswick-Nexus-Solid-Less-than-5-games-/251312032257?_trksid=p2047675.l2557&ssPageName=STRK%3AMEWAX%3AIT&nma=true&si=%252BuZENnfSam3KBOJbKzGihBICvF0%253D&orig_cvip=true&rt=nc
Title: Re: Nexus Solid
Post by: charlest on August 03, 2013, 10:57:34 AM
Not sure why you would expect a dull solid, intended for medium-heavy to heavy oil, to be longer than a polished pearl, intended for medium-light to medium oil.
Smoother, yes, because it will almost assuredly be earlier and stronger, but longer?
Can you explain why you believe this?
Title: Re: Nexus Solid
Post by: PowrKoil17 on August 03, 2013, 11:48:11 AM
just my initial impression from the Brunswick vids, their testers were bowling on 44ft house shot, we bowl on a 41ft feathered out on the backend. I get your point though about the polished pearl aspect. the Nexus just seems a lot cleaner through the fronts with very little polish on it, starting up a little later being a lot smoother on the back end. either way, I will tweak the covers on both balls to get them where I want them and to play well when I need them. don't have ball in hand yet to really know what I got, just excited that I got a barely used Nexus for $37 shipped!
Title: Re: Nexus Solid
Post by: charlest on August 03, 2013, 01:20:16 PM
just my initial impression from the Brunswick vids, their testers were bowling on 44ft house shot, we bowl on a 41ft feathered out on the backend. I get your point though about the polished pearl aspect. the Nexus just seems a lot cleaner through the fronts with very little polish on it, starting up a little later being a lot smoother on the back end. either way, I will tweak the covers on both balls to get them where I want them and to play well when I need them. don't have ball in hand yet to really know what I got, just excited that I got a barely used Nexus for $37 shipped!

That's a great deal.
I wouldn't look at them as having different reactions, although they do, and should. I would look at them as handling different amounts of oil. The 2.5 handles medium or lighter oil and the Nexus handles medium-heavy and more. They'd complement each other; you wouldn't normally have a choice of using both balls on the same oil condition.
Title: Re: Nexus Solid
Post by: batbowler on August 04, 2013, 12:28:27 PM
I've had them both and the Nexus solid is a lot more ball than the 2.5. Different cores and coverstocks! The Nexus solid does get down the lane with ease, but the 2.5 is longer. The coverstock on the Nexus solid has the projection additive, but it's a solid and reads the mid lane earlier! I liked the Nexus solid a lot more and have another one to drill! Not a bad deal, but it would kill me to use a 16lb!! lol I'm at the 14lb area now and did find a nib for $74 shipped! Good luck with your new ball, Bruce
Title: Re: Nexus Solid
Post by: nord on August 05, 2013, 08:53:05 PM
I have a Brunswick Karma black/blue solid and a Nexxus f P+R.

Both are drilled identically for Full Roller and I am a 90 degree axis rotation zero degree tilt Full Roller.

Both balls have been taken to 4000 grit polished.

I bowl on 'very' dry lanes.

The Karma Solid goes very long and has a strong backend reaction.
The Nexxus has a much smoother, less angular earlier reaction but it is harder to control and gets a under/over reaction and rolls out really quick on these dry conditions.

The Karma hits hard and carries, the Nexxus hits weaker and has spotty carry.

Again this is on 'dry' conditions.

The Nexxus is made for more oil.
I got it for when I bowl on heavier oiled lanes.