win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3

Author Topic: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python  (Read 9261 times)

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« on: August 24, 2009, 01:15:33 AM »
1st I'de like to say, JUST MAKE ANOTHER ORIG INFERNO...

Both the rattler and python look very tame, my OI is strong, even till this day.  It has well over 500 games on it and it outhooks most of my bag.

I got to throw the rattler on a burnt 36ft sport shot, and it just seemed to wobble, not that strong OI roll.  It has to do with the core?

anyone out there throw/have all three and can review them VS each other?
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

 

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2009, 09:39:00 AM »
bump
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2009, 10:17:33 AM »

I never had the Inferno, but both my Rattler and Python are quite strong.

Both are laid out differently so it's hard to accurately compare them. The Python seems to read friction a bit more quickly, but that could also be because my Rattler is drilled Rico (I love it). Sorry I can't give you what you apparently want to hear.


--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff

www.brunswickbowling.com

The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.
Logged

icewall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 906
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2009, 11:49:55 AM »
the inferno is stronger then both the python and rattler.
--------------------
tournament average: 219

tweener
medium revs
medium speed
specs and ball layouts in profile

currently throwing
Visionary (O.P. / O. SS. / Glad S.)
Rotogrip (rogue cell)
lanemasters (black pearl)
Logged

ChrispyBrownies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1936
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2009, 03:13:07 PM »
Ive got an NIB Original Inferno, 15lbs, 2-3 pin, 3oz top. Made in the USA too.

For sale if you've got some deep pockets
--------------------
Trinity High School "A" Bowling Team
Louisville, KY
State champs- 2002, 2003, and 2008

Ten Pin Lanes Pro Shop
Louisville, KY

Morehead State University Bowling
Proudly Sponsored by Storm Bowling Products

www.StormBowling.com
www.RotoGrip.com
www.moreheadstate.edu/bowling
Logged

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #5 on: August 31, 2009, 08:06:16 AM »
$150
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

Maine Man

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2126
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #6 on: August 31, 2009, 08:11:03 AM »
Get the Swarm.  I love mine, it is a little stronger off the spot than the OI but is a VERY versatile piece for me, with no loss of hook over the past year.  Great ball.
--------------------
James Goulding
Moores Pro Shop
Bowler 2 Bowler Blog: http://bowler2bowler.wordpress.com
State Site: http://www.msusbc-maine.org
Local Link: www.lausbca.org
Chat: www.bowlingchat.net
Logged
James Goulding
Bowler Builders Pro Shops
Radical Staff
F.D.D.S. Tournament Director

jbuzz31

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1174
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #7 on: August 31, 2009, 08:11:18 AM »
quote:
$150


AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHH

ahem.
Sorry.  
Couldn't help myself.
--------------------
Ive Eaten From The Insane Root That Imprisons Reason
Logged

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #8 on: August 31, 2009, 08:24:52 AM »
quote:

I never had the Inferno, but both my Rattler and Python are quite strong.

Both are laid out differently so it's hard to accurately compare them. The Python seems to read friction a bit more quickly, but that could also be because my Rattler is drilled Rico (I love it). Sorry I can't give you what you apparently want to hear.

--------------------
Lane Carter


I wanted to know what's up.  I know the rattler is much weaker, but it rolls continuous which is good.  I'm not going to go out and blow all kinds of mulah on a Python if it's weaker (i have that covered in my bag already) if I can't get the reaction i want.  I just want something similar to my old OI.

quote:
the inferno is stronger then both the python and rattler.

Thanks for the info.
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2009, 08:30:54 AM »
quote:
quote:
$150


AHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHH

ahem.
Sorry.  
Couldn't help myself.


yeh yeh yeh  I wasn't serious by any means, unless ya gonna do it?
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

icewall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 906
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2009, 08:54:54 AM »
IMO the closest I could see in the current line up is the wild thing.

similar strength in oil (tad weaker) and both had what brunswick called (ultra low rg cores)



--------------------
tournament average: 219

tweener
medium revs
medium speed
specs and ball layouts in profile

currently throwing
Visionary (O.P. / O. SS. / Glad S.)
Rotogrip (rogue cell)
lanemasters (black pearl)
Logged

FrontTwelv

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 275
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2009, 09:46:32 AM »
thanks for the recomendation, but i already have a strong pearl.
--------------------
Drew Jordan
Columbus, OH
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #12 on: August 31, 2009, 12:29:45 PM »
Drew,

If my memory serves me correctly the Inferno was re-released about a year ago, maybe longer. You might get lucky and find another one.

Regarding the Rattler "wobbling" on the lane, this is the first I've heard of that unless the condition was too slick (for a pearl) to begin with, or maybe there was some carry-down. Was the layout one that you've used before?

For most of us the Rattler was surprisingly strong, so I wonder if any of the above applied that day... Good luck in finding another Inferno.


--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff

www.brunswickbowling.com

The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.

Edited on 8/31/2009 12:30 PM

Edited on 8/31/2009 12:30 PM
Logged

LotsaBalls

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #13 on: August 31, 2009, 12:47:00 PM »
I would have to agree mine was suprisingly strong it was my bench mark ball last season. I did nock the shine of with a well worn scotch bright. I would never call this ball weak, its very comparable to the OI in my opinion. If you were trying to duplicate an OI I would go a 1/2 in closer to pap with the pin than the OI you had an it should be close.
Logged

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: Orig Inferno VS Rattler VS Python
« Reply #14 on: August 31, 2009, 01:33:12 PM »
quote:
If my memory serves me correctly the Inferno was re-released about a year ago, maybe longer. You might get lucky and find another one.


It was at least two years ago...I picked one up and drilled it, and it was *significantly* pushier and more angular than the original release was.  In fact, I noticed this with the later Musky Infernos as well  they didn't seem to want to read the mids nearly as much as the 2003 Infernos did.

I do still have a NIB 2003 Inferno in the closet, but it would take a lot to entice me to drill it for a side-by-side.  
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
Logged
#TweetYourScores
Pages: [1] 2 3
« previous next »