win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Scorchin Inferno  (Read 1857 times)

Rc Charger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Scorchin Inferno
« on: November 27, 2008, 12:15:19 PM »
Were would you put the scorchin in todays line up or what would it be comparable to?

Rob
Logged

 

huskerfan711

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 133
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2008, 09:00:07 AM »
Slightly bitter I take it?


quote:
I'd place it in a Dumpster and buy a MoRich or 900 Global! Oop's, sorry, your Scorchin was an OK medium to heavier oil ball in it's day but as always, Brunswick Maxxed-out on good balls when they made the Absolute Inferno, an updated version of the Scorchin Inferno is now being sold as the Maxx Zone for about the same amounts of oil and a Pearl Smash Zone made for who knows what.  http://bowlingballreviews.com/ball.asp?ballid=2810
--------------------
Seahawks Fan! I don't hate other NFL teams, just their Fan's!

Edited on 11/27/2008 9:52 PM

--------------------
High Sanctioned Series: 770
High Sanctioned Game: 300 (x4)

Logged

NJStroker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2008, 09:06:02 AM »
i found my scorchin to be a weaker than expected. i was suprised at how weak it was as being advertised as being really aggressive. its a good med-oil ball when i polished it.
--------------------
Im so glad people are brainwashed to think that TRACK sucks. And its even funnier when im carrying with my TRACK ball and they're going flat ten with their OTHER BRANDS ball.
Logged

  • Guest
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2008, 10:48:23 AM »
My Scorchin' was best without too much surface. I like it very much with some polish, but it was also pretty good between 2000 and 4000 abralon.

The Maxxx Zone is stronger for me, but somewhat close is the Copperhead, not a match, but in the ballpark...


--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Amateur Staff
www.brunswickbowling.com
Logged

noturcuzin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1529
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2008, 10:50:44 AM »
I loved this ball! Unfortunately mine is pretty old and I will replace it someday. Anyway, I used this thing in tournaments as my heavy oiler and it worked great everytime. Like Drrev2000 said the Maxxx Zone is probably the closest thing they have released to it. Or, the remake of the Ultimate Inferno.
--------------------
CHRIS FARLEY:1964-1997
JOHN CANDY:1950-1994      
JOHN BELUSHI:1949-1982

"NO RESPECT, I GET NO RESPECT."-the great Rodney Dangerfield

InSite Bowling Products:2004-2008




Logged

NJStroker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1317
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2008, 10:55:49 PM »
quote:
brunswick haters sure seem to spend alot of time in this forum
--------------------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DGs6ULm2ZA8
im not a brunswick hater, im telling my story of what happened. it was pretty good like notclay said, it had to be smooth and nto a lot of surface.
--------------------
Im so glad people are brainwashed to think that TRACK sucks. And its even funnier when im carrying with my TRACK ball and they're going flat ten with their OTHER BRANDS ball.
Logged

Rc Charger

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 379
Re: Scorchin Inferno
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2008, 06:51:43 AM »
Thanks Guys
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »