BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: armswing on January 13, 2008, 03:41:38 AM

Title: sapphire zone question
Post by: armswing on January 13, 2008, 03:41:38 AM
does anyone know if what their calling the sapphire zone on the brunswick sites retired ball list. or is it even listed there?
--------------------
ARMSWING
Title: Re: sapphire zone question
Post by: charlest on January 13, 2008, 03:28:56 PM
On the retired ball list is the Parker Bohn MVP ball; as far as I know, it is VERY similar to THE Sapphire Zone solid, as they say it is.

http://www.brunswickbowling.com/uploads/TE/eM/TEeMfTN7-IpNqVHmeebCuQ/bohn.pdf
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")

Edited on 1/13/2008 4:31 PM
Title: Re: sapphire zone question
Post by: MegaMav on January 13, 2008, 03:42:55 PM
quote:
On the retired ball list is the Parker Bohn MVP ball; as far as I know, it is VERY similar to THE Sapphire Zone solid, as they say it is.

http://www.brunswickbowling.com/uploads/TE/eM/TEeMfTN7-IpNqVHmeebCuQ/bohn.pdf


I have talked to Parker about this ball, it is an exact copy just to clarify.
Title: Re: sapphire zone question
Post by: DON DRAPER on January 13, 2008, 03:59:39 PM
i checked the specs on the parker bohn III mvp on brunswicks website and they're identical to the specs on the sapphire blue zone which i found on bowlingballreviews.com
Title: Re: sapphire zone question
Post by: charlest on January 13, 2008, 04:03:07 PM
quote:
i checked the specs on the parker bohn III mvp on brunswicks website and they're identical to the specs on the sapphire blue zone which i found on bowlingballreviews.com


So, why do they say it is "similar", if it's identical?
Enquiring minds want to know.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ (http://"http://home.mchsi.com/~s-cross-7-28-71/FAQ.htm")

Edited on 1/13/2008 5:59 PM
Title: Re: sapphire zone question
Post by: MegaMav on January 13, 2008, 04:28:52 PM
Maybe to be ambiguous?