BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Brunswick => Topic started by: wei on February 10, 2007, 12:27:41 PM

Title: Strike zone or Fury?
Post by: wei on February 10, 2007, 12:27:41 PM

Hi Brunswick guys! Which ball is better on heavy oil or carrydown? SZ or the new Fury?
--------------------
Avg : 165
Highest game: 300

Title: Re: Strike zone or Fury?
Post by: strikestriketapped on February 10, 2007, 09:10:01 PM

Fury should hook more, but the Strike Zone is awesome.
--------------------
Hammer and Brunswick. The best of the best.
www.hammerbowling.com
www.brunswickbowling.com

Title: Re: Strike zone or Fury?
Post by: RSalas on February 11, 2007, 12:29:34 AM

quote:

---

Fury is stronger overall than the Strike Zone.

---

Now *that* is a scary thought.  
--------------------
...formerly "The Curse of Dusty," and "Poöter Boöf" before that...

Title: Re: Strike zone or Fury?
Post by: BrunsBrent on February 11, 2007, 02:29:33 AM

i strongly think that both balls are great, but my fury seems to handle better on a burnt up shot. its a good ball to go to when you have to play left and wheel it right, recovers very easily...
--------------------
The OFFICIAL Nick Smith padiwan

You might recognize me from such films as... "how to pre-bowl 900" and my arm made a guest apperance in "X-hole demo video"