Author Topic: twisted fury vs rattler (Read 1477 times)

J_w73 · « **on:** March 26, 2010, 08:53:26 AM »

Was looking at an older brunswick comparison chart and the twisted fury is plotted near the rattler.. just says it handles a little less oil.

looking to see if anyone has some real world information on the two balls.
--------------------
18 mph,350 rpm,PAP 5 1/2 x 3/8up, 15 deg axis tilt, varied rotational axis deg.. usually 45+
HighGame 300 x 4, High Series 808
Book Average 205,PBA Xperience 185

RSalas · « **Reply #1 on:** March 26, 2010, 05:18:03 PM »

IME the two are very similar in terms of overall hook, but the Rattler is cleaner through the front and more defined at the break.

I used to use the Twisted to even out front to back on shorter patterns, while for me, the Rattler is better suited to conditions where the track has broken down and I can make parallel moves.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com

Corey C · « **Reply #2 on:** March 26, 2010, 05:28:49 PM »

Rattler has a sharper backend than the Twisted for sure.
--------------------
Corey Clayton
Brunswick Amateur Staff
Turbo Grips Staff
Team Canada 2007, 2008, & 2009
All my equipment is professionally drilled by Rich Huzina at Strikes Pro Shop, Let's Bowl Calgary, AB
The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation

J_w73 · « **Reply #3 on:** March 26, 2010, 05:34:00 PM »

Can the rattler get too snappy and uncontrollable if I went with a longer than 5" pin to pap up near the VAL..?
Any over under issues with the rattler ??
If you know, how would it compare to the Black Widow Pearl.

looking for something to complement my sidewinder.
--------------------
18 mph,350 rpm,PAP 5 1/2 x 3/8up, 15 deg axis tilt, varied rotational axis deg.. usually 45+
HighGame 300 x 4, High Series 808
Book Average 205,PBA Xperience 185

Edited on 3/26/2010 5:34 PM

RSalas · « **Reply #4 on:** March 26, 2010, 06:16:14 PM »

Oh, I don't think you'll need to worry about the ability of the Rattler to complement the Sidewinder, as the two have different hook shapes.

Even when polished, I couldn't generate a change of direction from the Sidewinder, as it remained relatively even from front to back. In contrast, even when scuffed, the Rattler still wants to make a defined move at the break.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com

J_w73 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 26, 2010, 07:50:25 PM »

quote:
Oh, I don't think you'll need to worry about the ability of the Rattler to complement the Sidewinder, as the two have different hook shapes.

Even when polished, I couldn't generate a change of direction from the Sidewinder, as it remained relatively even from front to back. In contrast, even when scuffed, the Rattler still wants to make a defined move at the break.
--------------------
Ray Salas
Brunswick Amateur Staff
http://www.brunswickbowling.com

great.. that is what I am looking for.. for some reason Tom T. at brunswick kept steering me toward the Diamondback or Python..

didn't know if there was something wrong with the rattler that I didn't know about.

still looking for something between the rattler/ sidewinder and the avalanches.
Still not sure if something is needed or if the Avalanche solid is enough to fill the gap..
--------------------
18 mph,350 rpm,PAP 5 1/2 x 3/8up, 15 deg axis tilt, varied rotational axis deg.. usually 45+
HighGame 300 x 4, High Series 808
Book Average 205,PBA Xperience 185

Author Topic: twisted fury vs rattler (Read 1477 times)

J_w73

twisted fury vs rattler

RSalas

Re: twisted fury vs rattler

Corey C

Re: twisted fury vs rattler

J_w73

Re: twisted fury vs rattler

RSalas

Re: twisted fury vs rattler

J_w73

Re: twisted fury vs rattler