win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: infernos?  (Read 5754 times)

chitown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5876
infernos?
« on: July 08, 2006, 02:40:17 PM »
If one were to drill up a Scorching, Absolute, Smoking and Radical inferno with the same layout would there be enough separation to make a logical arsenal?

Is the Smoking and Radical just too close to be used in the same arsenal?

This is a serious question.  I don't know anything about the infernos except for the absolute that I seen in action.  The absolute looked like a great all around ball.

Edited on 7/8/2006 10:56 PM

 

jdhaze

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 254
Re: infernos?
« Reply #16 on: July 11, 2006, 11:15:23 PM »
From my own experience I can tell you the Smokin, Scorchin, and Absolute along with a spare ball have given me all the tools to handle anything from a THS to a sports league.  In fact I could probably do without the Absolute if I really had to.  But it fits in nicely between the two.  I just got back into the sport last fall and decided to stick with one line of balls so that the reactions would be similar, yet give me enough versatility to handle different conditions.  

Mine are not all drilled exactly alike, instead I drilled them to match up with thier strengths and purpose.  On all three the pins are about 4 inches from my Pap (4 1/2,0, so drilled fairly strong. The Smokin has the pin the highest at around 1 oclock from the ring, the Absolutes pin is at 3 oclock from the ring, and the Scorchin is at 4 or 5 oclock from the ring finger.  All the cgs are stacked or kicked out a little bit.  These are all basic drillings right off the Brunswick drill sheet, 2 L for the Smokin and close to 1 E for the Scorchin.  The Absolute I got used and just moved the thumb.  The Smokin and Absolute are in oob condition, the Scorching I took down to 400 grit, to handle a little more oil in my summer sports league.

What I like about the Inferno line is that they rev up and get into a heavy continuous roll.  Proshop guy told me that was because of the large sym cores.  Im not sure about that, but I do like the reactions.  All of the balls get through the heads with ease, and thats helpful for me as I dont throw the ball that hard, 15.5 -16 mph.  They all also have a strong predictable arc to the pocket.  The Smokin goes the longest, and ive been able to use it on anything from light oil and burnt lanes up to shorter heavy oil patterns, as long as there are dry back ends.  The Absolute handles med-med heavy oil and works well when carry down causes the Smokin to start to skid too long.  The Scorchin still gets through the heads nicely, but has the most movement in the mids with good movement on the back ends.  Its my heavy oil ball, but I also find it works very well following the oil line on a THS if they put a wall in the middle.  I may add in a Radical later, but I dont really have a need for it right now.  I would mainly get one to try out a true skid/snap reaction, that the Smokin never really had.  Im also trying out a Track ball with the pin over the bridge for drier lanes that I picked up used, but Ive only seen lanes too dry for the Smokin once, and still was able to make it work.

So imho, I think that line up could work well, however it would probably be better to have a different lay out on each ball.  With only 3 or 4 balls I think expanding the differences between the reactions will allow you to be more flexible and handle a wider range of conditions.

Hope this help, good luck!


JD

chitown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5876
Re: infernos?
« Reply #17 on: July 11, 2006, 11:57:35 PM »
quote:
From my own experience I can tell you the Smokin, Scorchin, and Absolute along with a spare ball have given me all the tools to handle anything from a THS to a sports league.  In fact I could probably do without the Absolute if I really had to.  But it fits in nicely between the two.  I just got back into the sport last fall and decided to stick with one line of balls so that the reactions would be similar, yet give me enough versatility to handle different conditions.  

Mine are not all drilled exactly alike, instead I drilled them to match up with thier strengths and purpose.  On all three the pins are about 4 inches from my Pap (4 1/2,0, so drilled fairly strong. The Smokin has the pin the highest at around 1 oclock from the ring, the Absolutes pin is at 3 oclock from the ring, and the Scorchin is at 4 or 5 oclock from the ring finger.  All the cgs are stacked or kicked out a little bit.  These are all basic drillings right off the Brunswick drill sheet, 2 L for the Smokin and close to 1 E for the Scorchin.  The Absolute I got used and just moved the thumb.  The Smokin and Absolute are in oob condition, the Scorching I took down to 400 grit, to handle a little more oil in my summer sports league.

What I like about the Inferno line is that they rev up and get into a heavy continuous roll.  Proshop guy told me that was because of the large sym cores.  Im not sure about that, but I do like the reactions.  All of the balls get through the heads with ease, and thats helpful for me as I dont throw the ball that hard, 15.5 -16 mph.  They all also have a strong predictable arc to the pocket.  The Smokin goes the longest, and ive been able to use it on anything from light oil and burnt lanes up to shorter heavy oil patterns, as long as there are dry back ends.  The Absolute handles med-med heavy oil and works well when carry down causes the Smokin to start to skid too long.  The Scorchin still gets through the heads nicely, but has the most movement in the mids with good movement on the back ends.  Its my heavy oil ball, but I also find it works very well following the oil line on a THS if they put a wall in the middle.  I may add in a Radical later, but I dont really have a need for it right now.  I would mainly get one to try out a true skid/snap reaction, that the Smokin never really had.  Im also trying out a Track ball with the pin over the bridge for drier lanes that I picked up used, but Ive only seen lanes too dry for the Smokin once, and still was able to make it work.

So imho, I think that line up could work well, however it would probably be better to have a different lay out on each ball.  With only 3 or 4 balls I think expanding the differences between the reactions will allow you to be more flexible and handle a wider range of conditions.

Hope this help, good luck!


JD


Thanks for the info.  Great review.  I'm going to seriously look into the inferno line.  I prefer symmetrical balls and will give these a consideration for sure.

MARKER

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 139
Re: infernos?
« Reply #18 on: July 15, 2006, 10:52:15 PM »
I just had an Absolute Inferno drilled up, have only 7 games on it.  But two of them had 8 strikes, and 5 total games out of 7 over 200.  This is a great ball.  Rolls very well.  Drilled like Brunswick 1L only 4 inches from PAP.  I can go from my Columbia Action on heavy oil right to Absolute Inferno and keep playing this until lanes dry out enough for Punisher.  For me this means being able to leave two balls home, and simplifying arsenal.  The best thing about this ball is for me it makes drier lanes play as if they have heavier oil. I am able to use lower ball position, lower speed, better accuracy.

This is a great ball!  Now my favorite. Goes long with  fairly strong backend.
Good carrying ball.  Even when it doesn't match lane conditions it will get you 9 pins.

Marker

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4364
Re: infernos?
« Reply #19 on: July 15, 2006, 11:28:19 PM »
I have seen the Radical in action.  It almost looks like it is a tweaked version of the Smokin.  I have used both the Absolute and the Smokin.  For me, with the same layout, the Absolute was earlier and handles oil better.  The Smokin was too over/under for me.  The Radical looked like it was going to handle oil better than the Smokin but had more backend than the Absolute.  It almost appears to fit in the middle of those 2 balls.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator

If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

YeahHossNV

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
Re: infernos?
« Reply #20 on: July 16, 2006, 12:27:11 AM »
For me the Radical does not overlap the Absolute. The Radical for me is about 4 boards stronger than the Absolute. The Absolute for me is earlier and a LOT smoother at the breakpoint.
--------------------
"Viva la Nacion De Brunswick"