It will be a slightly (emphasis on slightly) weaker version of a Monster Bruiser.

Core numbers are similar, but the cover of the reactive Sidewinder, while PowerKoil based, is not quite as strong as PowerKoil 18 which is on the Bruiser.

Verbs
--------------------
Larry Verble


Edited on 11/30/2008 7:07 PM

I have one that is drilled 4.5 from my PAP, pin down and CG a 45 degrees. Similar to the Brunswick Advanced asymmetrical drilling on their web site. The result...very clean through the front and strong move on the backend. It ends up being a hybrid reactive, it does not overreact. In terms of what brunswick ball does it remind me of...I agree with the bruiser comparison. But, feel that mine rolls closer to my Monster SmashR and my Red Fuze. My SmashR is drill label leverage, is sanded to 320 sand paper with a heavy coat of high gloss polish. The SmashR is earlier than the Sidewinder but, the look of both balls is similar overall. If you have a chance to pick one up, I would not hesitate. I grabbed one when I watched a friend's ball. If I could make a suggestion to Brunswick, I would say this is a very lucky mistake. I would change the colors and name and market it in the link as a reactive hybrid.

Fran

I have a both versions of the Sidewinder.  The original particle one is phenominal at evening out over/under conditions, still pretty clean considering its a Brunswick Particle ball, and overall a great medium condition ball.  The reactive one... Well, this ball is unbelievable.  Reminds me exactly of my Red Fuze.  Very clean, with a very strong midlane read and continues through the pins.  My one down fall is that on something fresher with clean backends you will tend to leave more 9-pins than with other balls because this ball changes directions tremendously.
I definitely have to agree with FranV that this would be a wonderful addition to their performance series.  
Thumbs up for a wonderful oops...