Unless Brunswick was misquoted in BTM, they recommend heat to remove oil from the coverstock. If your ball was damaged by using their process, they should replace it. I'm mostly repeating what I read here. A great majority of people who take the time to post have had good success with heat. Most of the people with problems tried extreme measures. LuckyLefty Sldge Hammer Soufle' anyone?
I know some people don't like heat because a new ball never exposed to oil will sweat material out. It might be plasticizer, but that's only a guess. A new ball shouldn't have an excess of plasticizer to be removed. Ebonite says it's the beating a ball's track takes that makes the plasticizer migrate there.
I don't buy a lot of high end equipment, so maybe I don't witness ball death as much as others. Loss of reaction is usually noticed more with the megahookers, sometimes with very snappy equipment. I've soaked 2 balls in hot water + Dawn, had one rejuvinated, and had one run through Hook Again.
I know Steven tracks all games put on his equipment and is a big time maintenance guy. If any of us outside of the industry knows coverstock cleaning, it's him. I wouldn't doubt covers get a little more brittle with each heat treatment. However, if a ball is near death, you are not taking a big chance at getting back a big chunk of performance. No matter what Brunswick says, I don't think balls should be heated on a regular basis, only when nothing else seems to work. Also, how many regular bowlers leave their equipment in a hot trunk on a regular basis? Maybe ball death and brittle coverstocks have more to do with long term abuse than an occassional heat treatment? I don't know. My equipment is only left in the trunk a few times a year due to an odd work schedule.
Greg T, how can you say that the dishwasher is the safest way to use heat? What do you base this on?
--------------------
Penn State Proud