win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?  (Read 11146 times)

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« on: September 08, 2014, 04:35:38 AM »
I usually get my bowling accessories and supplies from BowlersDeal.com. But I noticed they've stopped selling Brunswick's Rough Buff product. Perusing the other places that I'm familiar with, BowlerX isn't selling it. BowlersMart is selling only the 32 oz. size. Bowling.com and BowlingBall.com still have both the 6 oz. and 32 oz. Then I went on Brunswick's website and guess what? It's not listed. Only Royal Compound and Royal Shine.

Anyone knows why has Brunswick retired this product?
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards

 

baer300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 541
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #1 on: September 08, 2014, 06:17:04 AM »
Brunswick replaced the Rough Buff with a better product. The product is the Royal Compound. It is easier to work with and has a better formulation than the rough buff did.
Adam Baer
Track Regional Staff
Vise Regional Staff

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #2 on: September 08, 2014, 07:49:53 AM »
Adam, what is the difference between the compound and the Ruff Buff.

Specifically does the Compound take the ball to about 1500 like the Rough buff?  A different grit?

Regards,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

TWOHAND834

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4357
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #3 on: September 08, 2014, 08:02:39 AM »
Adam, what is the difference between the compound and the Ruff Buff.

Specifically does the Compound take the ball to about 1500 like the Rough buff?  A different grit?

Regards,

Luckylefty

I believe Royal Compound is 2500 as I have used it on my Violent Eruption.  I like the reaction I get from the ball with 2000 abralon with Royal Compound. 
Steven Vance
Former Pro Shop Operator
Former Classic Products Assistant Manager

Brunswick_fan_BrandonH

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 786
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #4 on: September 08, 2014, 08:26:57 AM »
Rough buff was about 2000 surface when applied, and the Royal compound is about 2500 surface when applied. The Royal compound doesn't clog the pores as much and creates a tackier feel. Also, royal compound is a brand new formula.
Vise Staff Member

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #5 on: September 08, 2014, 10:01:51 AM »
Adam, what is the difference between the compound and the Ruff Buff.

Specifically does the Compound take the ball to about 1500 like the Rough buff?  A different grit?

Regards,

Luckylefty

I believe Royal Compound is 2500 as I have used it on my Violent Eruption.  I like the reaction I get from the ball with 2000 abralon with Royal Compound. 

Maybe as you use it, you get something close to 2500 grit matte, but you really can't say RC will do that for everyone, with every ball. It's a very aggressive "compound". Remember it used to take balls from 220 grit to almost 4000 grit a few years ago, when Brunswick specified that Rough Buff as "the finish" for many of their balls

In my personal use I have seen VERY little difference between Rough Buff and Royal Compound. When applied by hand, over a base 500 surface, grit you can easily wind up around 2000 - 2500 grit matte finish. Use a spinner and slightly more pressure and you will wind up at 4000 grit easily. Start at 1000 - 1500 grit and a spinner, and you can, just as easily, wind up with a polished ball.

It is a very useful but very aggressive compound that allows you to get a wide variety of finishes/surfaces on a ball, but to say it IS 1500 or 2000 or 2500 is not only wrong, it does the compound a disservice. It is nowhere near that limiting; heck, its use is only limited by your imagination.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #6 on: September 08, 2014, 12:59:23 PM »
Rough buff when correctly applied is closer to 4000 abrylon
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2014, 01:52:41 PM »
At least for me, I've seen good ball reaction using Rough Buff on my Burgundy Ringer, Platinum Ringer, both Slingshots, my Meanstreak, as well as my ol' Track Sensor II. Hard to imagine that Royal Compound is better, but I do have a bottle of that and Royal Shine.
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards

Dave_in_Rio_Rancho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #8 on: September 14, 2014, 09:11:08 AM »
As far as I can tell Brunswick is retiring all of its products as it has sold it's bowling business to AMF.

Let me add to that. AMF, is buying all of Brunswick's Bowling Centers. At the same time Brunswick is selling off their products division. They say they would expect the buyer to keep the Brunswick name since the brand is well known; but that is not a condition of the sale.
« Last Edit: September 14, 2014, 09:35:31 AM by Dave_in_Rio_Rancho »

Dewey24

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2014, 07:27:20 AM »
Not to start a pissing contest but, Brunswick is not retiring anything. The Royal Finishes were introduced well over a year ago. They developed a product they thought was better then the rough buff. I personally like the rough buff better and have stockpiled some.
As has been stated in their release, the products division will continue to release equipment thru the sale, if it ever happens

Dave_in_Rio_Rancho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: Why has Brunswick retired its Rough Buff product?
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2014, 10:02:03 AM »
I recognize the realities of trying to continue selling merchandise while selling off the business. "Business as usual" is always the response to "What now?".

I wish them well as I have used their equipment for 25 years - I like their policy of showing what cores they actually use in each weight of ball.

They will be missed.