When we first learned that the Cuda 2000 was comming out, we were really disappointed when we found that it was not, in fact the original Cuda/c. This time we have the real thing! We had the pleasure of testing this ball with the original Cuda/c (solid) on hand for comparisson.
The first thing that we saw was that the new Cuda/c has the same type of hook cycle and carry than the original. The main difference, as you might guess is in the coverstock. What we found was that the holo-flex shell provides a more angular break than the original had. However, when we sanded the shell down to 1500 and finessed it to a high gloss, we got a much more even and smooth arc, with superior length.
We were able to test the ball on a couple of different lane conditions over the weekend and had a good chance to score on just about anything but oil with carrydown. We were using a label drill (pin 5" fron the p.a.p.) out of the box, and a pin 2" fron the p.a.p. with an extra hole 8" from the grip center. (with the shell sanded to 1500-polished) As it happened the lanes were supposed to have been stripped Friday night, but due to an equipment breakdown, there were a few lanes that had not been stripped, but were re-oiled. The regular condition with the dry backends were a nice fit for either ball, from a variey of angles on the lane. from the track, both balls got down the lane without any trouble and were hitting the pocket consistantly. The label layout was a bit sharper at the break and gave us a scare or two on flush hits that looked like the 9 pin wanted to stand up. The 2" layout was just a bit smoother around the corner and was carrying better than the label.
As we moved in we were able to see clearly that the Cuda/c does have it's limits, in terms of how many boards it will cross. We don't think that this ball is supposed to be at the top in total hook, and it isn't. We moved to the lanes that had not been stripped and had a much different path to the pocket, but were still able to throw strikes on good shots. The Cuda/c does need to encounter some friction in order to react to the lane and in this case the friction was on the outside part of the lane. On this condition, we had to get the ball outside of five in order to get the ball back and on the shots we didn't, we were light. Niether ball looked good in the heavier oil and we didn't get the chance to try the Cuda/c with the shell dull. It's just a guess, but we figure that the Cuda/c just wouldn't be your best option on oil, even dull. There are just too many other balls that would be better suited for that type of carrydown.
To summarize, the Cuda/c 2000 is a great ball for any medium to medium-dry lane condition. if the reaction you get from the ball in it's out the box finish is too sharp, sanding and polishing will make a big difference.
If you have any questions about this, or any of our other reviews, e-mail us at: proshop@bowlero.com