win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Eruption Review  (Read 2606 times)

C300inUpstateNY

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
Eruption Review
« on: June 08, 2011, 12:01:34 PM »
Hey all... I just posted a review for the Ransom Demand, noticed that there wasn't a spot to put a review for the Eruption yet, so I've posted it below.

Eruption

Ball specs after drilling:
15lb 11oz    Pin 2-3"
Box finish:  800-1000-2000-polish  

I've had great success with the Resurgence core in the past.  Some of my favorite balls, all with this core, have been the Resurgence, Momentum, Momentum Swing, Burst, and OutBurst.  All of those balls had different covers and different cover preps, and I've altered the surface on those balls as well.

I've also had great success with pearlized covers on lower RG balls.  The Momentum's cover was a performance pearl, and going back to before 2007 (the year I signed with Columbia 300), I absolutely loved the V2 Pearl, an Ebonite ball with a low RG core and a performance pearl coverstock.  Even stretching it to just performance pearl covers, the Pure Swing, Ran$om, Freeze, and Sharp NoiZe all rolled very well for me.

Therefore, when I heard that Columbia 300 was taking one of my favorite cores and putting it in a performance pearl cover... I couldn't wait to throw the Eruption!

I drilled this ball with the pin next to and slightly above my ring finger.  This put it 4" from my PAP, 3" above my midline, and 2" from my VAL, with an extra hole 3" below and 2" beyond my PAP, 3/4" bit at 2.5" deep.  The ring finger was also drilled 2" deeper than normal.  The CG ended up between my grip center and my PAP.

This cover clears the heads better than any previous cover on the Resurgence/Burst core.  I have thrown it for about 15-20 games so far, and it looks like it will match up very well on patterns between 35-38' and/or when the lanes have had a significant amount of play on them.  I used a worn 2000 pad on the ball to take away a little of the shine, and this made the ball a little smoother and a little easier to control at the breakpoint.  I haven't taken the cover any lower than 1000, but it doesn't appear that the cover will match up well on a tremendous amount of volume regardless of the surface prep.  It does appear to match up extremely well on any variation of lighter and/or shorter patterns, as the core helps the ball to rev up quickly and promote predictability at the breakpoint, while the cover glides the ball through broken-down heads.  I expect it to roll very well on Cheetah, especially after a few games have been thrown on the pattern.  Pin carry is well above-average, and once the lanes have transitioned enough to allow the ball to come into play, there does not seem to be a reason to put it away...at least not for several hours!

Compared to other recent Columbia 300 products:  Please keep in mind that I am an all-around average tweener: a medium speed, medium revs right-hander with some tilt.  Your ball-to-ball comparisons may vary!
The Eruption is...
    a lot longer and a little less angular than the Ransom Demand.
    a little longer and a little more angular than the Burst.
    a lot longer and a lot more angular than the OutBurst.
    about as long and a little more angular than the Sharp NoiZe.
    a little longer and about as angular as the World Beater.
    about as long and a little less angular than the Ransom.
    about as long and a little smoother than the Freeze.

If you have any questions, feel free to send me a message or leave a note on the forums and I'll try to get back to you soon!

 

Metal_rules

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1202
Re: Eruption Review
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2011, 05:10:39 PM »
 i got an Out Burst back in feb. and i have matched up with it very well. when i saw the Eruption has the same core and i was looking for a new pearl, i believe i will match up with this ball as well. i want to see what you may think if indeed this is the pearl for me. i am more speed dominate (aprx 16 -17mph) r/h and like to  play  down and in, i can move in if the outside of the lane lets me. not a lot of revs. i have moved down to 15lb ( this will be my 3rd new ball at 15) i still have 2  -- 16lbs left that i still use.   my Out Burst has a 3-4 " pin layout is    40 x 4 x 35  with a large balance hole at p3.  my pap is 5 over and 1/8 up. i love the re-action i get with this ball.  i am thinking of laying out the Eruption the same. so when the O/B is too much the Eruption should be perfect.


There's two kinds of music METAL and bullshit!

Whos Left

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: Eruption Review
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2011, 09:12:05 PM »
Devil's Advocate.  I noticed that you said that you had "great success" with the cover or core.  Is there such a

thing as bad success?



C300inUpstateNY

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
Re: Eruption Review
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2011, 01:22:52 PM »
I think you'll be very happy with a 1-2 combo of the OutBurst and Eruption.  Being more speed-dominate, I imagine you sometimes see inconsistency with balls designed to be used on drier conditions, as the covers sometimes clear the heads (and midlane) too much.  With the lower RG core of the Eruption, I think you'll see this ball read the dry appropriately and react consistently while still providing good entry angle.  It shouldn't force you too far outside of your comfort area of down and in.  I would recommend hitting it lightly with 4000 if it's too long out-of-box.
 
Let me know how it works for you... release date is approximately a week away!
Rack Ripper wrote on 6/12/2011 5:10 PM:
 i got an Out Burst back in feb. and i have matched up with it very well. when i saw the Eruption has the same core and i was looking for a new pearl, i believe i will match up with this ball as well. i want to see what you may think if indeed this is the pearl for me. i am more speed dominate (aprx 16 -17mph) r/h and like to  play  down and in, i can move in if the outside of the lane lets me. not a lot of revs. i have moved down to 15lb ( this will be my 3rd new ball at 15) i still have 2  -- 16lbs left that i still use.   my Out Burst has a 3-4 " pin layout is    40 x 4 x 35  with a large balance hole at p3.  my pap is 5 over and 1/8 up. i love the re-action i get with this ball.  i am thinking of laying out the Eruption the same. so when the O/B is too much the Eruption should be perfect.




Jeff Voght
PBA East Region Member
Columbia 300 Staffer since 2007
Owner, Iroquois Lanes & Restaurant since 2006

C300inUpstateNY

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 7
Re: Eruption Review
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2011, 01:28:37 PM »
Hmmm.... I guess if you won a tournament by beating your best friend on a crossover, that'd be success but it wouldn't feel as great as throwing a shot absolutely pure and defeating someone you can't stand?  Lol.  I haven't bowled great lately, I think I'd take any sort of success possible.  Point well taken! 
 
Whos Left wrote on 6/12/2011 9:12 PM:
Devil's Advocate.  I noticed that you said that you had "great success" with the cover or core.  Is there such a

thing as bad success?




Jeff Voght
PBA East Region Member
Columbia 300 Staffer since 2007
Owner, Iroquois Lanes & Restaurant since 2006