Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Columbia 300
»
Bedlam vs. 715A
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Bedlam vs. 715A (Read 1257 times)
nu2
Jr. Member
Posts: 12
Bedlam vs. 715A
«
on:
August 19, 2009, 05:02:21 AM »
Hello.
I happened to have a chance to pick either one of them. While their numbers are relatively close, have anyone seen them in action and able to give me suggestions about how different are they?
Thanks.
Logged
jp_NSB
Jr. Member
Posts: 23
Re: Bedlam vs. 715A
«
Reply #1 on:
August 19, 2009, 03:01:58 PM »
Well the Bedlam is a Columbia 300 ball and the 715A is a Track ball.
Hope that helps!
Logged
leftyinsnellville
Hero Member
Posts: 2345
Re: Bedlam vs. 715A
«
Reply #2 on:
August 19, 2009, 03:16:18 PM »
quote:
Well the Bedlam is a Columbia 300 ball and the 715A is a Track ball.
Hope that helps!
Which are both owned by Ebonite...so the balls are exactly the same. Flip a coin or buy the one you think looks sharpest.
--------------------
A flute with no holes is not a flute, and a donut with no hole is a danish.
http://averagebolwersballreviews.com/
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Columbia 300
»
Bedlam vs. 715A