win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Robo Action ?  (Read 3189 times)

302efi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2609
Robo Action ?
« on: February 20, 2006, 12:39:42 AM »
Action name, Robo cover, Robo core...See for your self:

http://cgi.ebay.com/15-ACTION-COLUMBIA-BOWLING-BALL-Test-Ball-Must-See_W0QQitemZ7220867274QQcategoryZ36105QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
--------------------
Nothing but Dyno-Thane

Live by the hook...Die by the hook

Robo-Arm bowlers SUCK...

 

OG1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2006, 10:11:12 AM »
Looks very interesting but I would question
Is it USBC approved since it is not the "production model"?
--------------------
Did they run the oil machine?  Was there any oil in it.....

Cranking_Inferno

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 394
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2006, 09:18:11 PM »
Its not the same ball.. the Action is not partical... look at teh pictures.. the ball says partical.. so its something else... not the same.. plus the real Action looks ay better.
--------------------
Arsenal:

EPX-T1 - Heavy oil
Action- Heavy to Medium oil
Original Inferno - Medium oil
Smoking Inferno - Medium to Dry
Blue Dot - Spare ball

jhutch769

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 782
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2006, 09:30:26 PM »
Overseas release maybe??

Or photoshop edit...

Edited on 2/20/2006 10:16 PM

htotheizzo3561

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 962
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2006, 09:33:29 PM »
This is interesting since the first run of Action Packeds were miss hit as particle p.17.  This may have been an experimental ball.
--------------------
Yo Yo Yo Mo Fo

Maelstrom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 937
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2006, 10:30:14 PM »
Wow, nice find. Same color and core as the Robo, but with a particle version of the M80. Could be interesting...
--------------------
I am a dragon. I eat things whole and alive. I live by a life of sin. I have an attitude worse than you can imagine. And I don't give a f*ck what you think...

OG1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2006, 10:49:22 PM »
quote:
Its not the same ball.. the Action is not partical... look at teh pictures.. the ball says partical.. so its something else... not the same.. plus the real Action looks ay better.


it says it was a test ball so it is quite possible it could have been particle as well as resin test balls......
Also note that this cover has not been on any Columbia balls yet......
--------------------
Did they run the oil machine?  Was there any oil in it.....

OG1

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2006, 10:33:48 AM »
quote:
I double checked our paperwork from USBC, and we did send balls in to the USBC before we made the changes to the project. So this ball did get approved by he USBC. Sorry for the confusion.

Pulze - This is a real ball (I have one). The logo was made smaller after the first run. That's probably why this one looks a little "sloppy".
--------------------
Jason Kosby
Urethane Chemist
Columbia Industries


just curious to know what ball is it listed under on the usbc approved ball list? There is only one Action listed. As far as I know every core and or cover change has to be listed separately.
--------------------
Did they run the oil machine?  Was there any oil in it.....

Laybzz74

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5688
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2006, 11:58:48 AM »
Kosby,
 IMHO, You MAY want to post something that shows that proof ...
--------------------
Man, I LOVE this game !!!

Robb in O'Fallon, IL (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM
**** Official "L/LM" ball "junkie" ****

http://www.lanemastersbowling.com
 
 "Master the Lanes with Legendary hitting power" !!!

Robb in O Fallon, IL 62269 (near Scott AFB)
LAYBZZ74@AOL.COM (Email addy)

bowlingmaniac017

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
Re: Robo Action ?
« Reply #9 on: February 22, 2006, 12:45:44 AM »
So is this a good ball and could it be used on a flood?
Mike