win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Cuda/C remake ?  (Read 3122 times)

Use2begood

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 399
Cuda/C remake ?
« on: September 28, 2006, 01:12:02 AM »
I have one of these and was wondering if anybody else has drilled one yet?  I was wondering how strong this ball actually is.  I ask this because I am still unsure on the coverstock, I have heard original G4 and I have heard Superflex.  There is a big difference between the two and I would like to hear some feedback from some of you.  If you have drilled it, do you find that it is strong or relatively week by todays standards?  Thanks in advance.
--------------------
Formerly known as PUP300
Logged

 

Goof1073

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2433
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2006, 10:54:07 AM »
I drilled a few of the remakes and found them to be a bit stronger in the mid-lane versus the original Cuda's.  Compared to a today's standards I would imagine the remake to be a good medium oil ball with decent flare.  Reaction would depend on drilling, surface, etc. but it should still perform very well.  

Just slap you favorite drilling into it and take it to the lanes...unless you were looking to fill a gap that you have??
--------------------
-Chris: DJ's Pro Shop : Auburn, MA
Logged

BOWL119

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1728
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2006, 09:17:38 PM »
Loved my CUDA/C. Another ball i wish I had never got rid of.
--------------------
T.J.

BOWLING IS FUN NO MATTER WHAT YOU SCORE. BUT A 300 IS ALWAYS NICE.

STRIKE ZONE & PYRO. STAND 15 AND THROW 10 OUT TO 5 AND SMASH THE POCKET. AT LEAST THAT IS THE PLAN OF THE NIGHT...
Logged

crankncrash

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 967
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2006, 04:51:48 PM »
I too would like to know what the difference is, I need one back.  That was a sick reaction, clean and strong but controlled at the break. ahhh i long for that again.
Logged

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2006, 04:53:58 PM »
I have been told the the ceramicore densities are almost half of the original ball. So probably a good ball but not even the same exact ball produced in the past.

Edited on 10/2/2006 4:49 PM
Logged

Hoselrockets

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #5 on: October 02, 2006, 05:00:13 PM »
These remakes are exactly the same ball as the original Cuda/C.  Hope the helps.
--------------------
Joe Jozwik
Midwest Account Manager
Columbia 300, Inc.
www.Columbia300.com
www.Trackbowling.com
1-800-531-5920
Logged

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #6 on: October 02, 2006, 05:07:15 PM »
Well supposedly i have been corrected i know what i hear from a good source, the lomar balls are not exactly the same but jj bowl who is a dm for Columbia says they are. So if he says they are then they are i am sorry for mis information.
Logged

Hoselrockets

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Re: Cuda/C remake ?
« Reply #7 on: October 02, 2006, 08:33:33 PM »
I apologize if I came off sounding a bit pushy...that tone wasn't intended.  I was just trying to help and get out the proper information.
--------------------
Joe Jozwik
Midwest Account Manager
Columbia 300, Inc.
www.Columbia300.com
www.Trackbowling.com
1-800-531-5920
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »