BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: Monster Stitch on June 30, 2004, 03:04:07 AM

Title: Detour vs CrunchTime...
Post by: Monster Stitch on June 30, 2004, 03:04:07 AM
Is the Detour a solid or pearl? I am getting mix reviews from a lot of people. Has anyone thrown these two balls? Would they compliment each other or would they be similar?

I've been thinking of getting these two balls.

Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Detour vs CrunchTime...
Post by: charlest on June 30, 2004, 06:28:02 PM
I don't have a Detour; Columbia's website says it's a solid, Super-FLex.

I'd bet it and the CT are too close to have both, without surface changes, as the CT's core is stronger than its specs indicate.
--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."
Title: Re: Detour vs CrunchTime...
Post by: charlest on June 30, 2004, 08:24:55 PM
quote:
The Detour is a solid...I'm not real familiar with the crunch time though. The Detour really reminds me of the Primal Rage with a much stronger cover. Mine tends to get through the heads ok with strong backend.
--------------------
"Definitions belong to the definer not the defined"   Toni Morrison

Carl


Primal Rage and Detour have the same coverstock: solid Super-Flex resin. Primal Rage
http://www.columbia300.com/gear/balls.cfm?bid=110
had low RG and high RG Differential cover. It was a major oiler in its day. Detour is mostly, if the reviews can be believed, for medium oil.
--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."
Title: Re: Detour vs CrunchTime...
Post by: P1atinumGQ on July 02, 2004, 06:57:39 AM
I wouldn't say that the Detour is a medium oil ball. It reacts on par with my Full Throttle, and that's rated as a heavy oil ball. I guess it depends on the conditions you're on, but once the Detour hits dry, man it flies.