Author Topic: Formula vs. Icon2 (Read 1405 times)

Tons of Fun73 · « **on:** February 06, 2005, 09:17:44 AM »

does anyone out there know if the formula has as much backend as the icon2 ifnot does any current columbis ball compare to the icon2 on the backend
thanks
mark

Tons of Fun73 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 06, 2005, 05:20:01 PM »

Tons of Fun73 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 06, 2005, 05:27:50 PM »

anyone

joeschmoe · « **Reply #3 on:** February 07, 2005, 05:07:45 PM »

Just go to C300's site.. http://columbia300.com quite a bit of info on both balls
--------------------
Girls make passes at guys with big glasses...Guys make passes at girls with big a@@es

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:05 PM

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:05 PM

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:06 PM

Tons of Fun73 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 08, 2005, 07:16:37 PM »

thanks but i hoping for a personal opinion from anyone who has trown both of those balls

bolt298 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 08, 2005, 07:34:59 PM »

I would say that the formula could have the hook potential of the icon 2 but it is much more erractic and lengthy....the icon 2 is by far a better ball and the formula isnt bad but it went very long for me and snapped hard....the icon 2 i had rolled much more and was smoother.
--------------------
Trey

Hey if ya gotta poop, DO IT!!!!!

Tons of Fun73 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 08, 2005, 07:40:00 PM »

thanks bolt i asked because i'm planning on getting a new ball wasn't sure about the formula. because if i don't get the formula than i have the chance to buy a used icon2 from my pro shop guy who drilled one but didn't like it so it is still in great shape

Author Topic: Formula vs. Icon2 (Read 1405 times)

Tons of Fun73

Formula vs. Icon2

Tons of Fun73

Re: Formula vs. Icon2

Tons of Fun73

Re: Formula vs. Icon2

joeschmoe

Re: Formula vs. Icon2

Tons of Fun73

Re: Formula vs. Icon2

bolt298

Re: Formula vs. Icon2

Tons of Fun73

Re: Formula vs. Icon2