BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: Tons of Fun73 on February 06, 2005, 09:17:44 AM

Title: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: Tons of Fun73 on February 06, 2005, 09:17:44 AM

does anyone out there know if the formula has as much backend as the icon2 ifnot does any current columbis ball compare to the icon2 on the backend
thanks
mark

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: Tons of Fun73 on February 06, 2005, 05:20:01 PM

ttt

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: Tons of Fun73 on February 06, 2005, 05:27:50 PM

anyone

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: joeschmoe on February 07, 2005, 05:07:45 PM

Just go to C300's site..  http://columbia300.com  quite a bit of info on both balls
--------------------
Girls make passes at guys with big glasses...Guys make passes at girls with big a@@es

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:05 PM

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:05 PM

Edited on 2/7/2005 6:06 PM

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: Tons of Fun73 on February 08, 2005, 07:16:37 PM

thanks but i hoping for a personal opinion from anyone who has trown both of those balls

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: bolt298 on February 08, 2005, 07:34:59 PM

I would say that the formula could have the hook potential of the icon 2 but it is much more erractic and lengthy....the icon 2 is by far a better ball and the formula isnt bad but it went very long for me and snapped hard....the icon 2 i had rolled much more and was smoother.
--------------------
Trey

Hey if ya gotta poop, DO IT!!!!!

Title: Re: Formula vs. Icon2
Post by: Tons of Fun73 on February 08, 2005, 07:40:00 PM

thanks bolt i asked because i'm planning on getting a new ball wasn't sure about the formula. because if i don't get the formula than i have the chance to buy a used icon2 from my pro shop guy who drilled one but didn't like it so it is still in great shape