BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: thedjs on January 22, 2010, 06:48:34 AM

Title: Full Swing or Pure Swing
Post by: thedjs on January 22, 2010, 06:48:34 AM

For an older bowler with slower speed (14-15 mph) and lower revs., which of these two would you recommend to fit above my Arch Rival and Bedlam?  Looking for something that will handle a little more oil but still have a very strong backend. I am leaning towards the Pure because it's polished and should give me a little more length.

Any opinions would be appreciated.

Title: Re: Full Swing or Pure Swing
Post by: CHawk15 on January 22, 2010, 02:53:43 PM

Full and Pure Swing are definitely a step up from the Bedlam, given similar layouts.  You're probably better off with a Pure Swing for the reason you mentioned.

Title: Re: Full Swing or Pure Swing
Post by: jls on January 22, 2010, 03:32:39 PM

quote:

---

For an older bowler with slower speed (14-15 mph) and lower revs., which of these two would you recommend to fit above my Arch Rival and Bedlam?  Looking for something that will handle a little more oil but still have a very strong backend. I am leaning towards the Pure because it's polished and should give me a little more length.

Any opinions would be appreciated.

---

The pure swing is polished,  but it is at a 1000 A pad...  So the ball is very aggressive...

With your slower speed, you may need to bring it up to a 4000 A-pad and polish..

great ball.....
--------------------
jls     "Obama, you wanna see my truck"