BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: gokenong on April 05, 2007, 05:45:29 PM

Title: max vs. attack
Post by: gokenong on April 05, 2007, 05:45:29 PM

which of these three is better?? which ball handles oil better?? likes and dislikes about the two?

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: cficare068 on April 06, 2007, 02:18:31 AM

Action Max is built to handle more oil than the Attack.  Haven't ever thrown the Max but I have the Attack.  Ball seems to rev up in the backend and just take off.  Great Med-Heavy Oil ball in my opinion.

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: gokenong on April 06, 2007, 05:13:32 AM

how about the backend of the max?? coz, i'm planning to get a ball, what i am choosing is between the max and an attack.. I want a ball stronger than my action... what is the typical reaction of a max as against that of an attack??

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: Hoselrockets on April 06, 2007, 08:50:41 AM

If anyone is looking for a barely used Max or Attack let me know. 15lbs.
--------------------
THB

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: cficare068 on April 08, 2007, 03:17:35 PM

If you want a ball stronger then the action the the Max is the way to go.  Although the Attack is a great ball. Its not as aggressive as the orginal action

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: gokenong on April 08, 2007, 08:17:33 PM

but would the attack already be good in long oil??

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: cficare068 on April 09, 2007, 07:33:53 AM

It would work in long oil.  But the Max would work better. Max is made to handle the slick stuff, more than the Attack

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: Hoselrockets on April 09, 2007, 02:27:22 PM

Max has a stonger cover than Attack.
--------------------
THB

Title: Re: max vs. attack
Post by: gokenong on April 09, 2007, 07:52:07 PM

ok, tnx for the replies guys...