win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Wild for Dry  (Read 3606 times)

thedjs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Wild for Dry
« on: June 24, 2003, 04:27:51 AM »
Is the Wild a good dry lane ball?  How would it compare with a Scout?
Logged

 

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6757
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #1 on: June 25, 2003, 12:39:11 AM »
The Wild is a very good medium dry to dry lane ball.  As far as I know, it is exactly the same ball as the Scout Reactive.  It has the same cover, same weightblock, and same differential.
--------------------
Strider
Penn State Proud
Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say.
Logged

channel surfer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #2 on: June 25, 2003, 12:48:10 AM »
Great ball, hits hard...... Light to medium oil, depending on drill pattern..
--------------------
My Bowling Clinic Site: http://channelsurfers.vze.com
Logged

Urethane Game

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #3 on: June 25, 2003, 01:06:38 AM »
I believe the Wild has Superflex while the Scouts have a tamer coverstock.
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #4 on: June 25, 2003, 04:49:31 AM »
Some minor corrections to the above posts from data available right here on ballreviews.com. Both the WIld and the Scout/R use the Super-Flex coverstock. The Wild does not use mica in the cover. See this review for a very good Wild review:

http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?ManufacterID=3&BallID=295&ReviewID=16008
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Strider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6757
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2003, 12:51:53 PM »
You could be right Charles, but Columbia make no reference to mica one way or the other.

Scout: http://www.columbia300.com/balls/balls.cfm?cat=3&id=97

Wild: http://www.columbia300.com/balls/balls.cfm?cat=3&id=144
--------------------
Strider
Penn State Proud
Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say.
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #6 on: June 26, 2003, 12:08:58 AM »
quote:
You could be right Charles, but Columbia make no reference to mica one way or the other.

Scout: http://www.columbia300.com/balls/balls.cfm?cat=3&id=97

Wild: http://www.columbia300.com/balls/balls.cfm?cat=3&id=144
--------------------
Strider
Penn State Proud
Teamwork is a lot of people doing what I say.


I know, but Mike Austin did in his review; that's why I referenced it. I trust Mike's information; he is a trusted driller across the country. I believe him when he says such as this.
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

dw23

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 986
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2003, 09:20:54 PM »
Does anyone know why the Columbia website describes the two Wild balls differently? One says mild backend and the other says sharp or snappy back end. Just wondering if there was something different in the cover.
Thanks,
DW
Logged
Deven Walls

Pro Shop Staff Member
Lord Field/Lane Masters
www.lordfield.com and www.lane-masters.com
"Changing Bowling, One Bowler At A Time"

channel surfer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Wild for Dry
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2003, 09:57:52 PM »
I dont think there is a difference. But there might be.
--------------------
My Bowling Clinic Site: http://channelsurfers.vze.com

ASK A PRO:http://channelsurfers.vze.com/atp.shtml

Bowl.. Grab life by the balls.

Money is no object to me because I dont have any...
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »