BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Columbia 300 => Topic started by: jrw on December 03, 2010, 10:46:48 PM

Title: pure physics
Post by: jrw on December 03, 2010, 10:46:48 PM: would the pure physics outhook the ebonite evolve
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: icefiction on December 04, 2010, 07:05:25 AM: yes it will
--------------------
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: HAMMERDOWN103 on December 04, 2010, 10:05:04 AM: By a bunch
--------------------
The problem with socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money too...
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: jls on December 07, 2010, 01:08:22 PM: quote:
would the pure physics outhook the ebonite evolve

In Heavy Oil, yes...

But the Envolve works well on the drier shots...Polished up, it's a beast...
--------------------
jls
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: justdale on December 07, 2010, 01:43:57 PM: Left with OOB condition, the Pure Physics will out hook the Evolve,
not even close
--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: pbaexp12 on December 08, 2010, 10:07:07 AM: I agree that the pure physics will out hook the evolve but only on oily shots. I have both these balls and the evolve had so much back end I could not use it on my local house shot. My pure physics however I was able to use with good scores. The evolve's backend is explosive!! Give it plenty of room. The pure had a lot of hooking power biting through the oil but the backend was smoother and controllable.

Both ball were drill very similar with both having pin up drills.

--------------------
you can email me at gr8_bwler@yahoo.com
My email address has no space the space is the underscore key...
latest 300 shot with arch rival yes!!
columbia is the best!
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: HAMMERDOWN103 on December 08, 2010, 11:32:42 AM: I would also argue that shined up the Pure Physics can fly off the backs. Staffer i bowl with has one drilled super early roll for wet dry and another long flippy drill shined up.
--------------------
The problem with socialism is, you eventually run out of other people's money too...
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: ChrisLak on December 10, 2010, 05:54:13 PM: I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: justdale on December 18, 2010, 11:18:46 PM: quote:
I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
+1 not even close
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer

--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: rengawB on December 23, 2010, 10:56:34 AM: According to bowl.com you only bowl twice a week and are nowhere near a 235 average. You only broke 229 average once. I bet you are not even a staffer!

quote:
I have seen these to balls roll in the same match and the physics hooks alot more
--------------------
Chris Lakatosh
Columbia 300 Staffer
Title: Re: pure physics
Post by: KoukiGS on December 23, 2010, 02:41:29 PM: Well his profile does say "former"