win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Full Swing?  (Read 1224 times)

thedjs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1017
Full Swing?
« on: August 02, 2009, 04:30:14 AM »

Would the Full Swing be a good fit over the Arch Rival or would the Bedlam be a better choice?

Thanks for the help.
Logged

 

icewall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 906
Re: Full Swing?
« Reply #1 on: August 02, 2009, 02:00:44 PM »
neither.

the arch rival is around the same strength as the full swing just a very different motion.

the bedlam will handle far less oil then both of them... more of a medium to medium-light skid flip ball
--------------------
tweener
medium revs
medium speed
specs and ball layouts in profile

currently throwing
Visionary (O.P. / O. SS. / Glad S.)
Rotogrip (rogue cell)
lanemasters (black pearl)
Logged

Joe Jr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: Full Swing?
« Reply #2 on: August 02, 2009, 02:20:35 PM »
The Full Swing would fit perfectly it will definitely handle more oil then the Arch Rival.
--------------------
My Vid
Just another hack with too much equipment.
Logged

Tward

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 45
Re: Full Swing?
« Reply #3 on: August 02, 2009, 10:59:53 PM »
the Bedlam is box finished shinny unlike the Arch Rival. The bedlam will out hook the Arch on the backend with a stronger movement at the oil line because of the Asymmetric core.

I really liked my Arch Rival but think that the Bedlam is 2x the ball


As far as the Full Swing it will be able to handle more volume of oil than your Arch Rival while being able to create backend when it is just lighter volume.

Both the Bedlam and Full Swing are the new benchmark balls in the C300 family. Either way you can not go wrong. It will just be personal choice of: do you like light surface in a solid or a strong pearl
--------------------
Trea Ward
PAP 4.5" & 1/4" down
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »